Search for: "Zuckerman v Zuckerman"
Results 121 - 140
of 195
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2011, 9:56 am
Zuckerman was counsel for several amici curiae in Brown v. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 10:06 am
Department of Labor’s Administrative Review Board’s en banc decision in Sylvester v. [read post]
31 May 2011, 7:28 pm
TweetLaw360 Quoted The Employment Law Group® principal attorney Jason Zuckerman on the DOL ARB’s decision in Sylvester v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 7:00 am
In Carpenter & Zuckerman v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 1:53 pm
It's a neat trick. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 10:22 pm
TweetThe Employment Law Group® attorney Jason Zuckerman was quoted in a Law360 article titled DOL Board Clarifies Scope of Whistleblower Protection regarding the DOL Administrative Review Board’s recent decision in Johnson v. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 11:37 am
Image via Wikipedia Ben James wrote an article titled DOL Broadly Reads Protected Activity in SOX Case in which he discusses the Brown v. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 11:08 pm
District Court ruling in Pezza v. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 1:02 pm
[Post by Venkat Balasubramani] Stern v. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 1:50 am
Defendants failed to meet their initial burden on those parts of the motion concerning those claims (see Pignataro, 38 AD3d 1320; see generally Zuckerman, 49 NY2d at 562). [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 9:18 pm
TweetThe Employment Law Group® attorney Jason Zuckerman was quoted in a Law360 article titled DOL Board Clarifies Scope of Whistleblower Protection regarding the DOL Administrative Review Board’s recent decision in Johnson v. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 8:54 am
The Employment Law Group® attorney Jason Zuckerman was quoted in a Law360 article titled DOL Board Clarifies Scope of Whistleblower Protection regarding the DOL Administrative Review Board’s recent decision in Johnson v. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 8:27 am
The case is Carri Johnson v. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 6:41 pm
The case is Stern v. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 4:11 pm
Stern, a California lawyer; no dice, said the district court in Stern v. [read post]
26 Mar 2011, 3:42 pm
Of particular interest is The Court's holding regarding intoxication of the injured worker; "The evidence that the plaintiff was not engaged in a statutorily protected activity or was intoxicated was not admissible (see Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 563, 404 N.E.2d 718, 427 N.Y.S.2d 595; Maniscalco v Liro Eng'g Constr. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 1:42 am
One aspect of this issue was covered in my post on the case of Ntuli v Donald ([2010] EWCA Civ 1276). [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 3:53 am
This Court affirmed (see Healy v Spector, 287 AD2d 541). [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 1:24 am
Zuckerman critically analyses the decision. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 2:25 pm
Recent case developments under Section 806 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, including the Fourth Circuit’s decision in Stone v. [read post]
