Search for: "f/n/u Smith"
Results 121 - 140
of 143
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Sep 2014, 6:57 am
That’s what a Minnesota statute — now being challenged before the Minnesota Court of Appeals — does: Subdivision 1. [read post]
4 Mar 2007, 5:10 am
Davis, 326 F.3d 361 (2nd Cir. 2003)(same). [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 5:00 pm
The SG says that whether review is warranted “is a close question,” but “[o]n balance” the case warrants review to resolve a conflict between the Washington Supreme Court and the U.S. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 6:00 am
Brown DorothyABrown Emory Kara Bruce ProfessorKBruce Toledo Matthew Bruckner Prof_Bruckner Howard Sam Brunson smbrnsn Loyola Chicago Ryan Bubb ryan_bubb NYU Neil Buchanan NeilHBuchanan George Washington Trevor Buck trevbuck De Montfort U (UK) Alafair Burke alafairburke Hofstra Beth Burkstrand-Reid beth_burkstrand Nebraska Kylie Burns snailsinbottles Griffith (Australia) Sarah Burstein design_law Oklahoma Michael Burstein mburstein Cardozo Naomi Cahn NaomiCahn George… [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 4:44 am
Brown DorothyABrown Emory Kara Bruce ProfessorKBruce Toledo Matthew Bruckner Prof_Bruckner Howard Sam Brunson smbrnsn Loyola Chicago Ryan Bubb ryan_bubb NYU Neil Buchanan NeilHBuchanan George Washington Trevor Buck trevbuck De Montfort U (UK) Alafair Burke alafairburke Hofstra Beth Burkstrand-Reid beth_burkstrand Nebraska Kylie Burns snailsinbottles Griffith (Australia) Sarah Burstein design_law Oklahoma Naomi Cahn NaomiCahn George Washington Gillian Calder gilliancalder Victoria Stephen… [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
And strangely, Part II-A of Professor Tillman’s brief devotes six pages to arguing (mistakenly) that “[i]n the Constitution of 1788, the President did not hold an ‘Office … under the United States,'” without arguing that the same is true in Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment—let alone that the alleged limited meaning of that phrase in 1788 is a reason for reversing the Colorado Supreme Court.) [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 9:28 am
924 F. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 10:30 pm
Kurzban, Annie Lai, Christopher N. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:27 pm
We also consider the extent to which popular sovereignty can be constrained under the U,S, constitutional system.II. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:07 am
It's been almost a year since my last series of posts on the fallout from Hobby Lobby--in particular, on the challenges by nonprofit organizations to the government's augmented religious accommodation. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 2:40 pm
I am happy to report the publication of my article, "The Corporate Social Responsibilities of Financial Institutions for the Conduct of their Borrowers: The View From International Law and Standards," Lewis & CLark Law Review 21(4):881-920 (2018). [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 12:22 pm
• Rose U. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 12:22 pm
• Rose U. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 9:35 am
§ 1126(f), so only impaired creditors get to vote on the plan. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 6:41 am
Lee, 579 U. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 9:14 am
Alaska Public Offices Com'n v. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 11:42 am
Romney said repeatedly what John F. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 9:05 pm
During my recent visit to Columbia Law School, Professor John Coffee shared with me a draft of a short article that later appeared in the New York Law Journal.[1] Coffee’s article assessed the prospects in the U.S. [read post]
24 May 2019, 3:01 pm
Smith, Karolyne Garner, for Terry Carter, Respondent. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 7:34 am
Ass'n, Inc. [read post]
