Search for: "(admin)"
Results 1381 - 1400
of 5,271
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jan 2014, 2:16 am
On appeal from: [2013] EWCA Civ 920; [2013] EWHC 481 Admin These appeals arose from a Command Paper setting out the Government’s strategy for obtaining development consent for a high speed rail link from London to the north known as HS2. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 4:05 am
Admin., 2010 NY Slip Op 07932, Decided on November 3, 2010, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentThomas Hughes, an Office of Court Administration [OCA] court officer, was served with disciplinary charges alleging, among other offenses, failing to keep his uniform in proper condition, failing to keep his weapon properly loaded, and keeping an impermissible metal-jacketed round in his weapon.The disciplinary hearing officer found that Hughes was guilty of “engaging in acts of misconduct… [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 9:05 pm
UCLA admins grovel, humiliate veteran profs over charges of “microaggression” [Heather Mac Donald, City Journal] Meanwhile, this piece on overuse of disability card/trigger warnings in academic settings has already gotten labeled #AbleistAbuse so read at own risk [June Thunderstorm, The Baffler] Toughened D.C. truancy laws “flooding schools with paperwork and pushing tardy students into the criminal justice system” [WP] Polite opinion beginning to turn in favor of… [read post]
4 Jun 2023, 5:39 pm
With arguments over for the term, and in lieu of any admin law decisions to discuss (though I expect the usual summer opinion deluge is imminent?) [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 6:22 am
Ahmed v Murphy (2010) EWHC 453 (Admin) applied {our report here].Similarly, the issue of improvements was within the RAP’s expertise. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 6:22 am
Ahmed v Murphy (2010) EWHC 453 (Admin) applied {our report here].Similarly, the issue of improvements was within the RAP’s expertise. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 11:45 am
Today, the U.S. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 7:47 pm
Obama on Banking: The Worst Deal They Could Cut: I have had a somewhat up-and-down history with the folks in the Obama administration. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 11:45 am
Today, the U.S. [read post]
14 Apr 2025, 12:12 pm
Those trying to gauge what Trump 2.0 means for directors’ and officers’ liability will want to read the Wall Street Journal’s April 13, 2025, article entitled “Trump Administration Retreats from White-Collar Criminal Enforcement” (here). [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 3:24 am
The judge considered the purpose and effect of s.23 by reference to the case of R(on the application of Idolo) v Bromley LBC (2020) EWHC 860 (Admin), (2021) HLR 17, our note here. [read post]
28 Sep 2022, 1:26 pm
Admin. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 5:36 pm
The case of R (Interim Board of X) v Ofsted ([2016] EWHC 2004 (Admin)) provides a useful guide for public authorities and claimants who may be involved in public law injunctions. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 4:12 am
Candidate on military duty must be eligible and reachable for appointment for name to be placed on a special military list following dischargeMatter of Woods v New York City Dept. of Citywide Admin. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 12:14 pm
R(Gardiner) v Haringey LBC [2009] EWHC 2699 (Admin), [2009] All ER (D) 301 (Oct). [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 7:24 am
Last year we reported the decision R (Smith) v Land Registry [2009] EWHC 328 (Admin) in which the High Court held (amongst other things) that it was impossible to acquire land by adverse possession if that land was subject to a public highway. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 12:36 am
R (Peat and others) v Hyndburn DC [2011] EWHC 1739 (Admin) is the first successful challenge to a selective licensing scheme. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 10:14 am
Obama Admin Eases Deportation Rules: Stephen Dinan of The Washington Times reports the Obama administration Friday proposed new rules that would make it easier for illegal immigrants applying for legal status to stay in the U.S. if they have a spouse or parent living here legally, and would be subject to "hardship" if separated. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 2:07 am
In R (Isherwood & Ors) v Welsh Ministers [2022] EWHC 3331 (Admin), the issues were the legality of guidance documents issued under the Curriculum and Assessment (Wales) Act 2021 and whether or not parents had a right to withdraw children from mandatory relationships and sexuality education (“RSE”) The arguments The claimants argued that there was a common law right of “excusal” – a right to withdraw their children from lessons – and that statements in… [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 12:36 am
R (Peat and others) v Hyndburn DC [2011] EWHC 1739 (Admin) is the first successful challenge to a selective licensing scheme. [read post]
