Search for: "APPLIED PHARMACY" Results 1381 - 1400 of 1,646
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Oct 2010, 9:47 am by Steve Hall
That doesn’t mean this legal standard applies outside of the context of a stay of execution–in general, someone could still challenge the use of non-FDA-approved drugs in an execution. [read post]
17 Oct 2010, 10:43 pm by FDABlog HPM
The Department rejected industry comments that refunds should be prospective only and that it would be unfair to apply FCPs retrospectively to all prescriptions filled under the TRICARE retail pharmacy benefit since January 28, 2008. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 9:11 am by FDABlog HPM
Where otherwise permissible to fax a controlled substance prescription to a pharmacy, the agent may do the actual faxing. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 5:52 am by Beth Graham
In In re Professional Pharmacy II, No. 2-10-163-CV, (Tex. [read post]
26 Sep 2010, 11:18 am by On the Net
The following is the actual text of Arizona Proposition 203 that will be on the November 2, 2010, ballot. [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 10:20 pm by Ben Vernia
At issue were Medicaid claims submitted by specialty pharmacies which had unwittingly filled prescriptions allegedly tainted by kickbacks. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 4:58 am by Sean Wajert
  But this narrative skipped several crucial steps: after the doctors prescribe the drug, TPPs relying on the advice of Pharmacy Benefit Managers and their Pharmacy and Therapeutics Committees, placed Zyprexa on their formularies as approved drugs, and then TPPs failed to negotiate the price of Zyprexa below the level set by Lilly. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 11:50 am
"If a dependent under age 19 applies with a parent or legal guardian and the parent or legal guardian is uninsurable, the dependent is ineligible. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 8:45 am by Harley Geiger
Congress created an exception to this rule for drugs that the patient is currently taking, and CDT recommended HHS apply the exception to generic equivalents as well. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 8:52 am
CMS PROPOSES CHANGES TO PRESCRIPTION DRUG PRICING REGULATIONS:In early September, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) released a proposed rule that seeks to repeal specific elements of Medicaid prescription drug regulations that were published in 2007.The proposed rule would apply to provisions that were challenged in court by pharmacy groups following the initial 2007 implementation of the regulations, and that were also acted on legislatively in 2008, when a… [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 11:19 am
(bold added for emphasis)              “Groups” Exception The definition in Section 6509-a continues with an exception: Nothing contained in this section shall prohibit such persons from practicing as partners, in groups or as a professional corporation or as a university faculty practice corporation nor from pooling fees and moneys received, either by the partnerships, professional corporations, university faculty practice… [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 11:05 am
If certain of the exceptions in the law apply, or if I am referring you for other than clinical laboratory, pharmacy, radiation therapy, or x-ray or imaging services, I can make the referral under one condition. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 10:56 am
(a) With respect to referrals for health or health related items or services other than clinical laboratory services, pharmacy services, radiation therapy services, or x-ray or imaging services, [read post]
11 Sep 2010, 9:26 pm
The rule prohibits financial arrangements and referrals but only applies to certain designated health services, as follows:              1. [read post]
11 Sep 2010, 1:45 pm
Corporate practice of medicine rules can be quite complex, and range from "strong" to "weak" doctrines.Here is some legal research on the corporate practice of medicine doctrine in New York state:   All states require a license to practice “medicine” and make it a crime to violate this requirement. [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 12:35 pm by Bexis
  Not so, the court held - "the federal rules apply. [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 11:48 am by Jason Martin, Esq.
The court found that these deficiencies did not apply to all of the disputed claims. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 3:42 pm by dbmadmin
In Clayworth, plaintiffs, retail pharmacies, bought prescription drugs from pharmaceutical manufacturer defendants. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 5:30 am
  The plaintiffs conceded those requirements were met, but argued that CAFA’s local controversy exception applied. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 8:10 am by Green and Associates
When you are applying for a license (or renewing one) from the California Medical Board, State Bar, Department of Real Estate, Department of Pharmacy, Board of Registered Nursing or any other state agency or any employer that is required to report to state agencies or databanks (such as hospitals), all applicants need to remember the following basic guidelines:1. [read post]