Search for: "Application of State of California"
Results 1381 - 1400
of 18,054
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jan 2014, 5:33 pm
The court continued that, "To do so would violate the Commerce Clause, which precludes such extraterritorial application of state law." [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 5:33 pm
The court continued that, "To do so would violate the Commerce Clause, which precludes such extraterritorial application of state law." [read post]
26 May 2022, 9:57 am
The state of California is primed to bring 21st-century fiber access at affordable rates to every Californian. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 1:46 pm
Effective April 1, 2018, California became the first state to require all acute-care hospitals and skilled-nursing facilities to develop and implement comprehensive workplace violence prevention plans. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 3:23 pm
Mutual Restraining Orders Under California Law The California statute pertaining to mutual domestic violence restraining orders states that a court cannot issue a mutual order unless both parties present written evidence of domestic violence in an application for relief. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 5:37 am
Seems that University of California Hastings College of Law graduate Robert Bowman is in a bit of a catch-22, courtesy of the New York State bar. [read post]
9 Jan 2021, 8:04 am
The California State Bar has released the results from the October 2020 online bar exam. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 10:56 pm
California is a no-fault divorce state, meaning that a spouse does not need to prove any wrongdoing to file for separation. [read post]
5 May 2011, 8:48 am
As you may already know from reading previous posts, In the state of California, it is unlawful to harass a person (an applicant or employee) because of that person's sex. [read post]
28 Oct 2012, 11:53 am
The State of California should adopt a VCI 3 and make it run co-terminus with IRS Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Programs. [read post]
19 May 2022, 2:25 pm
More specifically, the court applied the strict scrutiny standard of review applicable to gender-based classifications, and held that the State failed to carry its burden and sufficiently prove that the use of gender-based corporate board seat requirements was necessary and narrowly tailored to achieve a compelling state interest. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 8:14 am
And the Nonprofit Quarterly recently published Erin Bradrick’s article “California’s New Regulations: The Start of a New Problematic Trend in State Charity Oversight? [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 2:54 pm
As the California Court of Appeal noted, the state is free to extend unexpired statutes of limitation, and this was the case with Mr. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 12:58 pm
California recently passed Senate Bill 826, a law requiring all publicly held corporations based in the state to have a minimum number of women on their boards. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 7:50 am
But the California bills go farther than the SEC rule, both in requiring disclosure of Scope 3 emissions across the board and in their application to all, rather than just publicly traded, companies above the revenue threshold. [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 2:06 pm
In the United States, legislators in California and Texas have introduced bills directed at Google Earth and other similar applications. [read post]
6 Aug 2020, 6:08 pm
” This holding may have other future applications. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 11:57 am
But there have been recent victories to reverse this trend, including: restoring the California Public Utilities Commission’s regulatory authority over broadband companies, the state’s passage of the strongest net neutrality law in the land (that is still facing litigation from the ISPs), and California Governor Gavin Newsom’s Call for a Broadband For All Plan. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 10:22 am
The San Diego Union-Tribune has this editorial on Proposition 57 and the recent court decision on its application to sex offenders:The San Diego Union-Tribune Editorial Board has advocated for criminal justice reform more often than any other editorial board in California in recent years for good reason. [read post]
10 Apr 2021, 6:42 pm
They said in part:The First Amendment requires that a State treat religious conduct as well as the State treats comparable secular conduct. [read post]
