Search for: "Attorney General v. Superior Court" Results 1381 - 1400 of 3,267
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Nov 2010, 12:03 pm by Raj Chohan
  If the lower courts had viewed the generous arbitration clause in the Concepcion’s phone contract for its fairness to the Concepcions, the contract may not have been deemed unconscionable. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 2:08 pm by Robert B. Milligan and Dogan Ervin
The court found that the trial court was diligent in arriving at its attorney fee determination and that there was no basis on which to conclude that the trial court’s attorney fee award was “clearly wrong” or that the trial court otherwise abused its discretion in determining the amount of the attorney fee award. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 6:00 am
General Scope of the Attorney-Client Privilege Both state and federal law protects certain communications between attorneys and clients. [read post]
26 Dec 2007, 5:54 pm
Hammond.Jensen, now 39, pleaded guilty in 2000 in Allen Superior Court to vicarious sexual gratification and child molesting. [read post]
12 Jul 2015, 4:01 am by Administrator
 Canada (Attorney General), 2015 SCC 37 (35808) Canada’s Superior courts have jurisdiction re Federal Child Support Guidelines. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 4:17 am by Andrew Frisch
[T]here will be no right or authority for any dispute to be brought, heard or arbitrated under this Policy as a class or collective action, private attorney general, or in a representative capacity on behalf of any person. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 3:45 am by Peter Mahler
That’s the question confronting the New York Court of Appeals, the state’s highest court, in Pappas v. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 12:34 pm by Joshua Lloyd
The Pennsylvania Superior Court recently noted that “internet contracts” make it “easier than ever for corporations to bind inexperienced, unaware, and unsuspecting consumers to arbitration agreements with the simple click or swipe of their finger…” Chilutti v. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 3:58 pm by Shahram Miri
Tam, Los Angeles County Superior Court, Case # BC541794. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 4:30 am by Laura Simons
Businessweek reports that the basis of the suit, which was initiated by the state's attorney general, was that J&J officials wrongfully touted its drug as superior to competing antipsychotic drugs and attempted to minimize its links to diabetes. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 3:59 am
In so holding, the court relied upon the then-current version of the TMEP, which required “clear evidence of generic use. [read post]
23 Dec 2018, 7:53 am by Wolfgang Demino
On April 24, 2017, Law Firm filed two complaints on behalf of NCSLT 2006-3 against Douglass in King County Superior Court. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 8:55 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Superior Court); and mitigation requirements (City of San Diego v. [read post]