Search for: "Best v. State Bar"
Results 1381 - 1400
of 5,441
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jan 2020, 1:12 pm
The D.C. legislation would lift that tax bar, with the District of Columbia joining states like New York and Illinois in allowing private parties to take on a tax enforcement function typically restricted to government. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 9:58 am
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit’s NLRB v. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 11:19 am
Swayne also had a strong legal reputation, as the New York Post praised him as having an “enviable reputation” as a lawyer and among the best members of the bar. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 2:25 pm
Sci., Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 4:00 am
” At the Council of State Governments’ Knowledge Blog, Lisa Soronen weighs in on Lomax v. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 11:06 am
Jonathan Hacker, representing Outokumpu, took the podium to defend the lower-court’s ruling barring arbitration. [read post]
20 Jan 2020, 3:55 pm
Van Lare v. [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 3:42 pm
Attorney General; HCJ 11298/03 Movement for Quality Government in Israel v. [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 12:42 pm
" Collins v. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 8:05 pm
In United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 10:45 am
The Metis Group, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 1:58 pm
In Babb v. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 10:45 am
Sullivan, 446 U.S. 335 (1980); and a third based on United States v. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 3:00 am
The Fall (1956) is narrated by a disgraced lawyer sitting in a Dutch bar. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 12:03 pm
Applied Sierra Club v. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 9:16 am
The Supreme Court’s Rule 23 decisions have had the effect of forcing the plaintiffs’ bar to “re-boot” the architecture of their class action theories.[2] At least one result was the decision three years ago in Tyson Foods v. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 9:16 am
The Supreme Court’s Rule 23 decisions have had the effect of forcing the plaintiffs’ bar to “re-boot” the architecture of their class action theories.[2] At least one result was the decision three years ago in Tyson Foods v. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 5:39 pm
The trial court held that the Department’s failure to seek or allocate funding to maintain the hotel was a project, but denied the petition concluding that the Foundation’s claim was barred by the statute of limitations. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 5:39 pm
The trial court held that the Department’s failure to seek or allocate funding to maintain the hotel was a project, but denied the petition concluding that the Foundation’s claim was barred by the statute of limitations. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 10:26 am
OSU v. [read post]
