Search for: "Brown v. Brown"
Results 1381 - 1400
of 12,712
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2017, 8:09 am
Report finding segregation in D.C. schools heads news items including drug treatment for inmates, delaying the bar exam and an admission of firebombing. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 11:34 am
Real property — Foreclosure action — Statute of limitations In 2016, appellees, acting as substitute trustees,1 filed an Order to Docket in the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County, seeking to foreclose on real property owned by Comfort and Kofi Boateng, appellants. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 1:52 pm
Here's a nice, sensible, moderate opinion from the California Supreme Court. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 6:42 am
Real property — Foreclosure — Circuit court jurisdiction In 2019, appellees, acting as substitute trustees, filed an Order to Docket Foreclosure in the Circuit Court for Montgomery County, seeking to foreclose on real property owned by Melissa Washington, appellant. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 10:27 am
Back in 1980, the Ninth Circuit held that federal courts were required to abstain from (and hence not decide) habeas petitions in which the petitioner sought to preclude a pending state court criminal action on the ground that it violated his federal constitutional speedy trial rights. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 4:31 am
Here: Chemehuevi Opening Brief California Answer Brief Reply Lower court materials here. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 4:03 am
Here: Cert Petition Questions presented: 1. [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 5:28 pm
The Court's unusual action in this regard is noted at Crime and Consequences. [read post]
13 May 2015, 1:22 pm
What do you do when (1) a retained criminal defense attorney takes $50,000 from the defendant to represent him, (2) (allegedly) doesn't prepare at all for the upcoming trial, but instead simply tries to persuade the defendant to plea, and then (3) on the eve of trial, both the defendant and counsel express displeasure with the resulting situation, with the attorney moving to withdraw (because the defendant won't take a plea) and the defendant asking to fire his attorney because he took the… [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 6:48 pm
I'm sure that trial judges appreciate it when the Court of Appeal expressly recognizes that the work performed below is (1) important, and (2) doesn't always have the same inputs as the particularized efforts undertaken on appeal.So, in this opinion, Judge Wiley (from Los Angeles) gets reversed. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 1:48 pm
Complicated civil business disputes are a huge hassle to actually take to trial. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 2:09 am
Professor Catherine J. [read post]
8 Feb 2013, 12:15 pm
I can't necessarily see anything wrong with the legal analysis in this opinion. [read post]
17 Sep 2007, 12:46 pm
Nothing at all from the California Court of Appeal today (at least as of this afternoon). [read post]
19 Sep 2007, 11:19 am
Raping a killing a 15-year old girl is evil enough. [read post]
1 May 2015, 11:56 am
I didn't know that you could be convicted in federal court by an 11-person jury. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 11:51 am
Sometimes you wonder how a trial court can get something so wrong. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 4:42 pm
I certainly can't wax as poetic as Justice Wiley. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 5:25 pm
31 Jul 2020, 6:50 pm
The following introduction, from the top of page 3 of this opinion, sounds a little more like something you'd see in a work of fiction (or perhaps by Justice Kavanaugh) than in the statement of facts of a Court of Appeal opinion:"Lions was about to enjoy an afternoon beer outside . . . . [read post]
