Search for: "CANNING v. DOJ" Results 1381 - 1400 of 2,715
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 May 2016, 3:05 am by Broc Romanek
Members can sign up to get that blog pushed out to them via email whenever there is a new entry by simply inputting their email address on the left side of that blog. [read post]
23 Aug 2019, 2:58 am by Walter Olson
Housing authority in Meeker, Colorado, population 2,250, will pay nearly $1 million to settle suit over limits on emotional support animals [Niki Turner, Rio Blanco Herald-Times, Kathleen Foody, Associated Press/Colorado Sun, Stina Sieg, Colorado Public Radio] Volume of web-accessibility suits continues to climb [Seyfarth Shaw; John Breslin, Florida Record] More on growth of this litigation [podcast with Karen Harned, NFIB, for Federalist Society Regulatory Transparency Project (earlier on pool… [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 12:35 am
- Chicago attorney Jonathan Rosenfeld on Strellis & Field's Chicago Nursing Home Lawyer Blog Jones Day v. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 11:18 am by Justin Silverman
” The DOJ, however, believes that American Library Ass’n v. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 3:00 am
Aurobindo Pharma Limited (Patentcircle) India/US: Indian pharma sector ‘fares well’ in US disputes (PatLit) India: The woes of the grassroot innovator in the agricultural sector (Spicy IP) South Africa: Biopiracy in Alice – Schwabe Pharamaceuticals wishes to patent method for extracting active ingredient in cough medicine from pelargonium roots (Afro-IP) UK: Okay to split costs where actions are joined, says Court of Appeal: Actavis UK Ltd v Eli Lilly & Co Ltd (PatLit)… [read post]
27 Nov 2009, 3:38 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: http://duncanbucknell.com/subscribe/   Highlights this week included: Get ready for the .eu IDN landrush on 9 December, midnight! [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 5:00 am by John Jascob
By Lene Powell, J.D.In a Practising Law Institute program, a panel of SEC, CFTC, and DOJ enforcement officials discussed the impact of the Second Circuit’s decision in U.S. v. [read post]