Search for: "COOPER v. STATE" Results 1381 - 1400 of 7,406
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 May 2011, 6:12 am by Mark Zamora
Basic laws of evidence will almost assuredly keep many of the allegations out of the courtroom without a proper foundation and more importantly cooperation from a non party witness. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 10:46 am by Bernard Bell
  As a correspondent of mine has observed, it is difficult to see how a bi-state commission can continue to operate effectively if one signatory refuses to cooperate and adamantly insists on leaving. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 5:51 pm
Union itself is a fund manager and member of a cooperative of financial institutions, consisting almost entirely of banks (see here, in German) and two of its main shareholders are banks, namely DZ Bank AG and WGZ Bank AG. [read post]
21 May 2009, 1:02 am
The court of appeals tethers this holding to Klapesky v. [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 9:23 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
In response to the recent Equal Protection challenge to ICWA by a small number of states in Haaland v. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
However, in its December 5, 2013 opinion in Venecia V. v August V., the Appellate Division, First Department, held that no malpractice had been committed, and no hearing was required to reach that conclusion. [read post]
29 May 2010, 7:48 pm
However, Peter King of Sports Illustrated stated that the decision may not be the champagne-popping moment for the NFLPA. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 1:53 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Global Process Systems Inc & Anor v Berhad [2009] EWCA Civ 1398 (17 December 2009) Boots Company Plc v HM Revenue & Customs [2009] EWCA Civ 1396 (17 December 2009) National Navigation Co v Endesa Generacion SA [2009] EWCA Civ 1397 (17 December 2009) Cooper & Ors v Fanmailuk.Com Ltd & Anor [2009] EWCA Civ 1368 (17 December 2009) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Fleet v Fleet [2009] EWHC… [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 10:10 pm by Matthias Weller
In its judgment of 8 February 2024, the CJEU had to decide whether “the application of the Brussels Ibis Regulation be based solely on the fact that two parties with their seat in the same Member State agree on the jurisdiction of courts of another EU Member State. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 7:09 pm
Judicial Administration of the Relationship Between States and the General Government—A Legalization of Federalism --Bond v. [read post]