Search for: "Carrier" Results 1381 - 1400 of 32,518
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Feb 2012, 11:42 am
These recommendations come in light of a joint meeting that was conducted this past week involving the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration’s Motor Carrier Safety Advisory Committee and the Medical Review Board. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 10:42 am by Alan Ackerman
The Texas Supreme Court has appropriately reinforced its opinion that by simply calling itself a “common carrier” with the Railroad Commission of Texas, “common carrier” status is not provided. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 1:58 pm by David Brisco
 Most jurors have had positive experiences with their own insurance carrier or otherwise feel no reason to view the subrogating carrier negatively. [read post]
1 May 2012, 6:01 am by GPL
The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration tightens the leash on carriers that have been sanctioned. 49 CFR Part 386 has been amended, and the new rule will go into effect May 29, 2012.According to truckinginfo.com,The key change: paying a full civil penalty in an enforcement proceeding does not give the entity the ability to unilaterally avoid an admission of liability. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 1:26 pm
The so-called “network neutrality” issue made huge headlines earlier this year when Google, along with Verizon, urged Congress not to bind wireless carriers to the same rules as wireline carriers. [read post]
21 Aug 2008, 4:58 pm
 The plaintiffs and defendants (insureds) in that underlying action, along with the first-layer D&O carrier, reached a settlement agreement without the consent of the excess liability carrier, despite the settlement implicating that policy. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 1:19 pm by Lawyer Sanders
Their goals were to identify motor carriers in violation of federal drug and alcohol testing requirements and to remove from the road commercial truck and bus drivers who jump from carrier to carrier to evade federal drug and alcohol testing and reporting requirements. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 9:48 am
The duty to inspect, maintain and repair semi trucks in the motor carriers fleet is codified in part 396 of the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations. 396.1 provides that: "every motor carrier, its officers, drivers, agents, representatives and employees directly concerned with the inspection or maintenance of motor vehicles shall comply and be conversant with the rules". [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 11:11 am by Lebowitz & Mzhen
The difference lies in the fact that mail carriers are generally federal government employees. [read post]
1 Aug 2009, 5:13 am
Safersys.org is a web site maintained by the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 10:00 pm
Truck accident lawyers in Texas will welcome a new rule by the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration that will require certain commercial truck carriers to have Electronic On Board Recorders installed on their vehicles. [read post]
9 Mar 2013, 11:01 am by oliver randl
These include, for example, fork-like members with the three teeth separated by teeth without a carrier, or a with a carrier not on its horizontal side; members with teeth bearing carriers that do not extend across the width of the tooth; or members with teeth that have carriers arranged only on the top or the bottom on the tooth. [2.4.3] It is not enough to state, as does granted claim 1, that the carrier is on a “horizontal side” of the… [read post]
19 May 2022, 12:48 pm by Jon Brodkin
"In many ways, digital platforms that hold themselves out to the public resemble traditional common carriers," Thomas wrote. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 10:00 pm
The California Trucking Association (CTA) has named its annual safety winners, including several bulk carriers. [read post]
29 May 2014, 6:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
   The carrier also asserted that there was a delay beyond its control in the form of personal issues for the mediator. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 4:13 am by David DePaolo
The carriers mark up the premiums to cover the commission. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
   With respect to the coverage issues presented in this matter, the Superior Court noted that, when a carrier is presented with conflicting facts that are material of the issue of coverage, the carrier may not merely select or, as here, passively, “accept,” a singular disputed fact, to provide the carrier as a basis to deny coverage. [read post]