Search for: "DOES I-X" Results 1381 - 1400 of 7,395
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jun 2009, 7:00 am
  What the Order does not say is what is required to be filed if the debtor has no pay advices? [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 4:35 am
  So there is much that the theory does not capture or does not capture cleanly. [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 10:49 am by Tom Smith
For example, "What are the elements of X" or "Describe Y concept. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 1:57 pm
 I get all that.But if all that's true, then why does the Court of Appeal hold that those general rules don't apply here? [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 5:00 pm by Steve Bainbridge
In the merger agreement, X Holdings I, Inc. is known as the Parent and X Holdings II, Inc. is known as the Acquisition Sub. [read post]
5 May 2009, 5:34 am
An S corporation is  a pass-through entity and does not pay federal income tax. [read post]
27 Aug 2022, 2:08 pm by David Adelstein
For instance, it is not uncommon for a construction contract to list as unforeseeable, excusable delay the following events or items: “(i) acts of God or of the public enemy, (ii) act of the Government in either its sovereign or contractual capacity, (iii) acts of another Contractor in the performance of a contract with the Government, (iv) fires, (v) floods, (vi) epidemics, (vii) quarantine restrictions, (viii) strikes, (ix) freight embargoes, (x) unusually severe weather,… [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 12:02 pm
The Department of Labor does not see it that way. [read post]
25 Jan 2009, 7:52 am
  If individual I prefers state of affairs X to state of affairs Y, then X produces more utility for I than does Y.The move to preferences as the basis for utility offered economists the possibility of solving the problem of measurement. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 10:00 pm by Giesela Ruehl
In particular, the Court is empowered to rule only on the interpretation or the validity of European Union acts on the basis of the facts placed before it by the national court or tribunal (Case C-491/06 Danske Svineproducenter [2008] ECR I-3339, paragraph 23, and the judgment of 10 November 2011 in Joined Cases C-319/10 and C-320/10 X and X BV, paragraph 29). [read post]
25 Aug 2013, 7:29 am by Paul Horwitz
At the same time, however, I don't think "I really admire X" or "X has done so much for us" is a sufficient basis for the conclusion that "as far as I'm concerned, X can serve as long as he or she wants." [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 1:29 pm by Howard Knopf
The Supreme Court of Canada has specifically stated that this alone does not give rise to liability. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 12:56 pm
The pediatrician took X-rays and believed that the girl might have a broken her right hip. [read post]
8 May 2019, 11:41 am by John Jascob
Von Hoene acknowledged that one size does not fit all, but the same general principles apply. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 4:32 pm
Dazed Beauty uses Beauty_GAN, an artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm written by two design studios (Selam X in Berlin and ART404 in New York City) to create hair and make-up looks without human intervention.How does the algorithm work? [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 9:57 pm by Bradley R. Hall, E.D. Mich.
App’x 631 (6th Cir. 2006) (Camiscione I), the court reversed a sentence of one day in the Marshal’s Lockup followed by three years supervised release. [read post]