Search for: "Daniel R. Long" Results 1381 - 1400 of 2,658
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2013, 5:59 am by Daniel Schwartz
Daniel SchwartzEmployees generally are eligible for overtime if they work more than 40 hours of work, unless one of the limited exceptions applies. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 3:30 am by Bill Marler
  However, what about an outbreak that has a long Epi curve – an outbreak like the Wright County Salmonella egg outbreak that limped along for nearly a year before it is recognized? [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 1:04 pm
Under § 17200 and §15800 a beneficiary lacks standing to challenge a trust so long as the rust is revocable and the person holding the power to revoke the trust is competent. [read post]
23 Jun 2013, 1:44 pm by Buce
Catch of the day: Daniel Lazare's LRB deconstruction of Shlomo Sand's deconstruction of the history of the Jewish "People"  and "Land"--the terms Sand uses, though he describes each not as a history but as an "invention"   Lazare's account seems to have been long in the baking: Sand's "people" book came out in English in 2010, in Hebrew two years earlier. [read post]
22 Jun 2013, 7:02 am by Benjamin Wittes
During the Senate debates over the 2012 NDAA, an exasperated Lindsey Graham (R-SC) all but begged detractors to “please read the damn bill. [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 1:05 pm
It was the end of a long day, and the ER staff was keen to move their patients to other hospital departments. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 3:59 am by Terry Hart
It is the freedom to create independently, facilitated by copyright, that has long been recognized as essential to a free press, a free society, and a free culture. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 9:45 am by Lisa Stam
 For some good analysis about the case, Daniel Schwartz has discussed the case a couple of times in his blog, Connecticut Employment Law Blog. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 6:31 am by Daniel Schwartz
Daniel SchwartzOn Friday, the Second Circuit issued an important decision in the long-running battle between the state unions and the government about whether layoffs of only union personnel violated the First Amendment. [read post]