Search for: "Defendants A-F"
Results 1381 - 1400
of 29,811
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2007, 6:00 am
., ___ F.3d ___ (11th Cir. [read post]
7 May 2007, 1:35 pm
" So writes Circuit Judge Boyce F. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 9:00 am
But Public Defender Matthew Hardy said the boy, who had learning disabilities, pulled the trigger after being manipulated to kill Hall by his stepmother, Krista F. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 6:25 pm
City of Mesa, --- F.3d ---, 2010 WL 1131492 (C.A.9 (Ariz.), 2010), the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal affirmed summary judgment against a putative class of police officers in a donning and doffing action. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 7:31 pm
The determination at issue was the approval of an incentive zoning application by respondents-defendants M & F, LLC, Daniele SPC, LLC, Mucca Mucca, LLC, Mardanth Enterprises, Inc., and Daniele Management, LLC – collectively doing business as Daniele Family Companies – in connection with a proposed Whole Foods store in respondent-defendant Town of Brighton. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 3:53 am
(f/n/a SFC), Defendants. 96 Civ. 3135 (JCF) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 2008 U.S. [read post]
9 Nov 2008, 11:35 am
Henderson, 536 F.3d 776 (7th Cir. 2008) (strictly limiting the application of Randolph). [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 10:15 am
The Court agrees that, following [In re MSTG Inc., 675 F.3d 1337, 1348 (Fed. [read post]
17 Oct 2012, 7:08 am
[Other] courts have concluded that the best course of action is to reserve [In re Seagate Tech., 497 F.3d 1360 (Fed. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 7:38 am
On December 31, 2021, Governor Hochul signed into law, effective immediately, the Comprehensive Insurance Disclosure Act, amending New York Civil Practice Law & Rules (CPLR) § 3101(f) to require defendants in civil cases to disclose voluminous and potentially sensitive insurance materials, including applications for insurance policies and information concerning other claims. [read post]
5 Jan 2007, 2:42 am
Jimenez, 300 F.3d 1166 (9th Cir. 2002), which had followed the Supremes in US v. [read post]
1 Oct 2016, 9:45 am
NB: Rule 4(f) only applies to foreign defendants. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 2:43 pm
Boyd, 86 F.3d 719, 723 (7th Cir. 1996). [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 8:49 am
Microsoft, 632 F.3d 1292 (Fed. [read post]
19 Nov 2008, 11:14 am
Two Elk, 536 F.3d 890, 904 n.14. [read post]
21 Aug 2006, 6:00 am
., ___ F.3d ___ (7th Cir. [read post]
7 Sep 2008, 9:20 pm
NATIONAL BASKETBALL ASSOCIATION, Defendant-Appellant, 961 F.2d 667 (CA7 1992), opinion by Judge Easterbrook. [read post]
10 May 2021, 5:00 am
.), Judge Joseph F. [read post]
24 Jan 2009, 7:47 am
Mukasey, 546 F.3d 1147, 1159 (9th Cir. [read post]
22 May 2018, 6:30 am
The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure created a bootstrapping problem or, as the court called it, a Catch-22, for Strike 3 – it was not able to confer with the unknown Doe defendant as required by Rule 26(f) because it could not identify the defendant, but it could not identify defendant without discovery from Comcast. [read post]
