Search for: "Doe Nos."
Results 1381 - 1400
of 2,061
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Dec 2011, 2:29 am
Patent Nos. 5,946,647. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 3:37 pm
Patent Nos. 5,946,647 (the ‘647 patent) and 6,343,263 (the ‘263 patent). [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 2:32 pm
Rather than using a Jane Doe pseudonym, Ms. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 1:30 pm
Brown (Supreme Ct docket Nos. 11-338 & 11-347) [See WIMS 5/19/11]. [read post]
10 Dec 2011, 10:37 pm
The appellant has questioned the choice of the audit firm also, on the ground that the said firm does audit work for several companies belonging to different branches of the Birla Group, being the industrial house having presence in several areas in the corporate sector of this country. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 6:21 am
., Nos. 95–5214, 95–5215, 129 F.3d 1263, 1997 WL 720406, at *2 (6th Cir.1997). [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 6:17 am
ERISA's anti-alienation provision, found in section 206(d)(1) of ERISA, under which plan benefits may not be assigned or alienated, does not change this result. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 3:30 am
, Nos. 10-349-BAJ-SCR, 10-592-BAJ-SCR, 2010 WL 4790904 (M.D. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 2:48 am
How does one actually occupy a metal staircase? [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 2:48 am
How does one actually occupy a metal staircase? [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 3:05 am
The Board concluded that CLASSIC CANADIAN is an inherently weak mark, and the evidence of commercial strength "does not overcome the mark's intrinsic shortcoming. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 3:12 am
" Use of two colors does not make this design inherently distinctive.The Board found it "clear from applicant's specimens of use that applicant's mark does not make a separate commercial impression. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 3:35 pm
Rio Tinto, PLC, Nos. 02-56256, 02-56390, 09-56381, 2011 WL 5041927 (9th Cir. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 12:09 pm
Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit, Case Nos. 09-36100, 10-35043, 10-35052, 10-35053, and 10-35054. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 5:35 pm
Patent Nos. 7,718,634 (“the ‘634 patent”) and 7,410,957 (“the ‘957 patent”). [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 5:18 pm
In addition, because the labeling does not provide accurate information about the quantity of residual peanut protein and suggests that Identi’s products have been tested in the same manner as Hill’s products, the labeling omits material facts and lacks adequate information for use. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 1:12 pm
Trademark Serial Nos. 85/239,324, 85/239,312, 85/239,299, and 85/239,285, whose images are shown below. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 12:42 am
The patents at issue in this case are US Patent Nos 5,352,605 (“’605 Patent”) and RE39247E (“’247E Patent”) which cover various aspects of the Roundup Ready soybean. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 10:16 am
Because the law does not favor the implication of easements, an easement by implication will not be found absent clear evidence that it was intended by the parties. [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 5:01 pm
The opponent’s submission that there is no disclosure that any-one has applied the known method to this particular situation does not necessarily establish that there was a prevailing opinion that this could not be done. [read post]
