Search for: "ENGLAND v. STATE"
Results 1381 - 1400
of 3,671
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2017, 6:00 am
R (Kiarie) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; R (Byndloss) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 15-16 February 2017. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 4:20 pm
In Donegan v. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 8:58 am
Douglas, prepared the famous case, Brown v. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 2:46 pm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in McDougall v. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 9:04 am
It's Flynn Pharma Ltd v Drugsrus Ltd and Tenolol Ltd [2015] EWHC 2759 (Ch), a 6 October 2015 decision of Mrs Justice Rose sitting in the Chancery Division of the High Court, England and Wales. [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 2:07 am
Basfar v Wong, heard 13th-14th October Her Majesty’s Attorney General v Crosland, heard 18th October Secretary of State for the Home Department v SC (Jamaica), heard 19th October [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 3:27 am
The 2006 Act does not have an equivalent in Guernsey, and it was therefore necessary to look to the common law (which the parties agreed mirrored that in England) to decide the basis on which Zurich was liable to indemnify IEG. [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 6:24 am
In 1895, the United States Supreme Court decided Coffin v. [read post]
14 Mar 2022, 2:00 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 16/3/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA and Ors, heard 4 May 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Basfar v Wong, heard 13th-14th… [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 4:19 am
Limiting the power to authorize DNA collection to judges ensures that an adequate detachment is maintained between the investigating body and the appraiser of reasonable suspicion on which DNA collection is predicated.RetentionOnce DNA has been collected pre-trial, divergence is also evident in terms both of the period and of the form of retention.Indefinite retention of DNA was once permitted in England and Wales, but was impugned in S. and Marper v. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 12:51 am
D.P.P. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 12:00 pm
Oct. 21, 2009) (Fosamax – back to England); Miller v. [read post]
10 Jan 2010, 5:33 pm
One such case is the matter of Abbott v. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 12:12 am
On 14 April 2011, the High Court of England and Wales ruled, in R (on the application of Joshua Moos and Hannah McClure) v The Commissioner of the Police of the Metropolis, that the police had acted unlawfully in “containing” (aka kettling) certain G20 protestors on 1 April 2009. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 1:44 am
R (on the application of Afzal) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 7th June 2023. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 4:46 am
: on two significant decisions on the legal recognition of same-sex couples: Buhuceanu and Others v Romania and Maymulakhin and Markiv v Ukraine. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 1:03 pm
An Appellate Court ruling in the case of Health Care and Retirement Corporation of America v. [read post]
16 May 2012, 7:00 pm
& Murphy v. [read post]
4 Feb 2017, 1:21 am
Readers with a fancy for online IP enforcement will remember that last July the Court of Appeal of England and Wales issued its decision in Cartier and Others v BSkyB and Others [here], in which it upheld the 2014 decision of Arnold J in the High Court [here and here] that blocking injunctions are also available in trade mark cases under the general power recognised by s37(1) of the Senior Courts Act 1981 (SCA). [read post]
31 May 2015, 3:47 am
Bio and pharma patent attorneys have had an entertaining few months following the exploits of Swiss-style claims in the Courts of England and Wales. [read post]
