Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE" Results 1381 - 1400 of 7,356
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Ford, President of the United States of America, proclaim and make public the Treaty, Protocol of Signature, and the exchange of notes, to the end that they shall be observed and fulfilled with good faith on and after January 21, 1977, by the United States of America and by the citizens of the United States of America and all other persons subject to the jurisdiction thereof. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
  It includes Beyond Backlash: Legal History, Polarization, and Roe v. [read post]
17 May 2013, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
(Hat tip: H-Law) Marc Lender discusses his book on Gitlow v. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 7:59 am by Sheldon Toplitt
Wainwright, that found the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments mandated states appoint counsel for indigent criminal defendants, Make No Law, concerning the New York Times v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 1:24 pm by Jeremy
I told him about cases such as Bauman v Fussell and Temple Island v New English Teas (the celebrated "Red Bus" case) and it occurred to me that I was describing things that seemed quite normal to me because I have lived with them for my entire professional life while they seemed astonishing and arbitrary to Robert because they didn't accord with what he felt was common sense and what he knew to be the way people do things in real life.Robert was particularly… [read post]
26 Aug 2016, 12:38 pm
 Yes, I fully understand that I am terrible at spelling, and grammar, and pretty much everything else remotely associated with the English language. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 11:44 pm
The website was in English but this was a global language and widely spoken in Bangladesh. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 12:12 pm
Available so far in just nine European languages -- none of which is English -- the Opinion of the Advocate General opinion in Case C-52/07 Kanal 5 and TV 4 v STIM makes interesting reading (unless you don't read the right languages, in which case it looks quite menacing on the page). [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 5:09 am by INFORRM
In balancing these two rights, Tugendhat J had in mind the “ultimate balancing test” as referred to by Lord Steyn Re S (A Child) [2005] 1 AC 593 (at para 17) and guidance from Lord Bingham in R v Shayler [2003] 1 AC 247 (at para 26) that interference of the ECHR right must not be stricter than necessary to achieve the state’s legitimate aim. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 4:28 am by Charles Sartain
On the black bacground Co-author Katie English McCabe Trust v. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 6:46 am by Kathy Kapusta
It’s been called “as deplorable and despicable as it is patently offensive,” and “probably the most offensive word in English. [read post]
1 May 2014, 3:26 pm by Jon Sands
  African Americans are under 6% of the population but an absolute disparity, as laid down in United States v. [read post]