Search for: "Employment Development Department for State of California"
Results 1381 - 1400
of 2,276
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Dec 2016, 8:37 am
Workplace Solution: With new laws being enacted continuously in California, we understand the struggle to keep up with developments. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 4:00 pm
California may soon follow, but currently, the state’s “ban the box” law is applicable only to government agencies. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 8:36 am
[4] Turner Construction Data Breach Notification Letter, State of California Department of Justice, Office of the Attorney General (last accessed 12/14/16) (available at https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/Turner%20Construction%20Ad%20r4prf_1.pdf?) [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 7:35 am
The Department of Labor also revamped the white collar exemptions from overtime pay. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 2:30 pm
Employers should also be mindful of potential developments in federal law with respect to the legalization of marijuana. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 4:16 pm
This week, four California lawmakers, including two San Jose Assembly members, introduced an “Opportunity to Work” bill in the California Assembly that would apply to employers across the state. [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 11:10 am
The Employment Development Department (EDD) administers this type of tax in the State of California. [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 9:59 am
In 1994, the NRDC Southern California office sued the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) to require the agency to address, among other things, stormwater violations resulting from run-off on highways in southern California. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 6:42 am
Employers also should remain aware of exemption requirements under applicable state law, which are unaffected by developments at the federal level. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 6:42 am
Employers also should remain aware of exemption requirements under applicable state law, which are unaffected by developments at the federal level. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 6:42 am
Employers also should remain aware of exemption requirements under applicable state law, which are unaffected by developments at the federal level. [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 2:31 pm
California public and private employers will have to await further developments in the coming days to determine whether the DOL can mount an effective litigation strategy to overturn the order, or concede that it will have to forego implementing the Final Rule for the time being. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 10:47 am
The Secure Choice program must comply with the principles embodied in the California law, and in the federal Department of Labor rules, Fisher explained. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 5:14 am
Although political affiliation is not a protected class under federal law, some states (such as California) and cites (such as Seattle) prohibit discrimination on the basis of political activities or affiliation. [read post]
17 Nov 2016, 5:30 am
California now has an Interagency Refinery Task Force, headed by CalEPA with participation from DIR, its division Cal/OSHA, and 11 other federal, state, and local agencies and departments. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 9:36 am
Federal enforcement agencies, such as the Department of Labor (DOL) and the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), and California enforcement agencies, such as the Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) and the Employment Development Department (EDD), have made it a top priority to crack down on the misclassification of workers as independent contractors. [read post]
11 Nov 2016, 8:08 am
PASSED—California Proposition 64 (recreational use): The Adult Use of Marijuana Act has passed. [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 9:17 am
At the state level, Californa’s Employment Development Department (EDD) helps veterans and eligible spouses to maximize employment and training opportunities. [read post]
4 Nov 2016, 10:58 am
If no past employer, then letter of reference from either one California State Court Judge or two attorneys admitted to practice in the state in which they practice. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 9:02 am
Department of Justice (OSC) and federal appeals process, which the California Senate called “an overly cumbersome process. [read post]
