Search for: "GREEN v. STATE" Results 1381 - 1400 of 6,084
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Mar 2021, 2:27 pm by Nathaniel Sobel
Given the vast quantity of private information on an ordinary cell phone, the police’s actions in this case, State v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 4:16 pm by Kali Borkoski
Greene, which was consolidated with Alford v. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 6:48 pm
Fed officials and many others have been talking up the economy and there has been talk of "green shoots" appearing in the economy. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 5:05 pm by Lyle Denniston
Supreme Court hear our defense of S.B. 1070.”  (The state’s case is Arizona v. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 8:23 am
(credit for map showing ICC members in green and signatories in gold) Yet relations between the 2 intergovernmental organizations have been tense, as discussed in posts available here. [read post]
18 Apr 2025, 2:17 pm
In the coming weeks, the court is poised to issue a major ruling in United States v. [read post]
” Following is an excerpt: A New York federal court recently declined to certify under Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“Rule 23”) six classes of salaried “apprentices” at Chipotle restaurants asserting claims for overtime pay under New York Labor Law (“NYLL”) and parallel state laws in Missouri, Colorado, Washington, Illinois, and North Carolina, on the theory that they were misclassified as exempt executives in Scott et al.… [read post]
” Following is an excerpt: A New York federal court recently declined to certify under Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“Rule 23”) six classes of salaried “apprentices” at Chipotle restaurants asserting claims for overtime pay under New York Labor Law (“NYLL”) and parallel state laws in Missouri, Colorado, Washington, Illinois, and North Carolina, on the theory that they were misclassified as exempt executives in Scott et al.… [read post]
3 Jul 2016, 11:01 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 86082 (D NV, June 30, 2016), a Nevada federal district court held that petitioners had stated a colorable free exercise claim based on the lack of halal-certified meals, but dismissed without prejudice ordering each petitioner to file separately stating allegations specific to him.In Green v. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 3:43 am by The Law Offices of John Day, P.C.
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 486 S.W.2d 721 (Tenn. 1972); Cavalier Insurance Corp. v. [read post]
28 May 2012, 9:07 am by INFORRM
The appeal by way of case stated in the “Twitter joke” case (Chambers v DPP) was heard on 8 February 2012 and judgment was reserved. [read post]