Search for: "House v. Close"
Results 1381 - 1400
of 7,515
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Nov 2011, 2:10 pm
There were 25 houses that did exceed the 8000 number. [read post]
7 May 2012, 4:30 am
Later in the afternoon, I began my closing argument by thanking the jury for not holding it against me that my suit coat did not match my gray pants. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 3:17 pm
They found defendant standing in the midst of a canine charnel house. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 12:03 pm
” via amgreatness.com V. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 3:08 am
Next, the Board applied the four-part test articulated in University of Notre Dame du Lac v. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 10:02 am
State v. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 3:19 pm
As another year draws near its close, a number of notable recent CEQA developments in both the legislative and regulatory arenas have occurred that bear mention. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 5:09 am
The house where he worked (growing cannabis) was “an ordinary house, far from a make-shift prison”, and he was provided with groceries at weekly intervals. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 1:43 pm
Oral arguments in California Building Industry Association v. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 1:43 pm
Oral arguments in California Building Industry Association v. [read post]
19 Sep 2021, 9:37 am
Before reading this post, read my new article, Online Account Terminations/Content Removals and the Benefits of Internet Services Enforcing Their House Rules. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 11:04 am
Yet the Sixth Circuit subjected a Kentucky COVID-19 order to heightened scrutiny because it closed houses of worship but not other "life-sustaining" organizations, without regard to which other entities were closed, too. [read post]
27 Nov 2018, 1:10 am
The Civil Procedure Rules and the case of Chesters Accommodation Agency v. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 8:49 pm
But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 2:50 pm
Their argument that s.213A, Housing Act 1996 had changed the relevant principles of law (as expounded in R (Stewart) v LB Wandsworth, LB Lambeth, LB Hammersmith & Fulham [2001] EWHC Admin 709) was also rejected at [47] (not an uninteresting argument though, unlikely to be sufficient to enable them to appeal). [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 5:22 am
The California Court of Appeal decision in Hassell v. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 8:45 am
It does so following the actions of WPL, a smaller software house. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 5:30 am
When a Supreme Court decision called Employment Division v. [read post]
24 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm
See, e.g., Soloman v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 11:50 pm
See United States v. [read post]
