Search for: "IN RE GRANT"
Results 1381 - 1400
of 37,587
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Oct 2011, 6:55 am
In In re Richard K. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 3:00 am
In re Dr. [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 10:13 am
Tenenbaum, the Court has entered an order:-criticizing defendant's counsel;-setting firm scheduling dates, including July 20th for a final conference, and July 27th for the trial, and estimating the trial duration at 5 days;-denying plaintiffs' motion to exclude expert witnesses;-allowing plaintiffs a deposition of defendant limited to fair use issues;-allowing defendant written discovery, but no deposition in accordance with defendant's lawyers' statement that they would take no… [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 5:01 am
Richard Re (Virginia) is based on his draft article, "Does the Discourse on 303 Creative Portend a Standing Realignment," which is forthcoming in the Notre Dame Law Review Reflection. [read post]
14 May 2010, 5:24 am
” In re Toyota, at 2. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 3:35 pm
The phrase “during the Recess” could modify only “fill up” and simply not apply to “Vacancies that may happen” at all.I would suggest that the clause can plausibly be read to mean: “The President shall have Power during the Recess of the Senate to fill up all Vacancies that may happen, by granting Commissions which shall expire at the End of their next Session. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 12:58 pm
In Re Appraisal of Metromedia International Group, No.3351-CC (Del. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 11:27 am
The Supreme Court of Canada will have to answer that question in the case of Re: Sound v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 4:00 am
The evaluation of whether a property tax exemption should be granted or not is fact-specific and there often is no simple one-size-fits-all answer or shortcut that can be taken. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 9:25 am
Texas A&M University, No. 07-1050 (more info) (opinion on improvident grant) (per curiam) This is a real rarity: The Texas Supreme Court's first "improvident grant" since 2003.4 The Texas Supreme Court disposes of most petitions without ever formally granting review. [read post]
31 May 2019, 8:39 am
(citing In re Caremark Int’l Deriv. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 4:44 pm
Sure, they may seek a warrant in circumstances in which they're not positive, or think there's only a twenty percent chance that one will issue. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 3:11 pm
In the course of discovery, Defendant sought and was granted forensic analysis of Plaintiff’s electronic media. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 9:48 am
You have to supply them with a reason for doing what they’re doing. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 9:33 am
The California Supreme Court last week granted review in Aleman v. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 12:09 pm
" Today in In re Google, Misc. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 12:48 pm
Needless to say, you're completely devastated.Oh, one more thing. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 10:13 am
(In re S.S. [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
In In re VEON Ltd. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 10:27 am
75-78), and that it was not precluded through the principles of res judicata from rendering this advisory opinion (because the U.K. and Mauritius had arbitrated a slightly different dispute before an arbitral tribunal, and because the U.K. and Mauritius are not the same parties in the present request for an advisory opinion) (paras. [read post]
