Search for: "In Re Edwards" Results 1381 - 1400 of 3,968
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Aug 2013, 1:27 pm by WIMS
Representative Edwards pointed out that legitimate scientific researchers already had the ability to access the Harvard University and American Cancer Society data sets." [read post]
5 Jun 2016, 11:03 am by rainey Reitman
The leaks were thanks in large part to whistleblower Edward Snowden, who has been living in Russia for the last three years, unable to return to the United States for fear of spending his life behind bars. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 3:20 am
In re Luna Cycles, Serial No. 87132160 (September 18, 2018) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Angela Lykos). [read post]
19 Apr 2015, 4:01 pm
 This conference will examine the ways in which exclusivity on a patent can be extended for the longest term, such as re-patenting, data exclusivity, paediatric exclusivity and regulatory extensions. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 8:30 am
" Get me Edward Bennett Williams...get me Al Krieger....get me Roy Black...and now Get me John Ritenour! [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 4:14 pm by Kevin LaCroix
In the following guest post, Delaware partners Edward Micheletti, Paul Lockwood and associate Chad Davis of the Skadden Arps law firm take a look at the Delaware Supreme Court’s December 14, 2017 opinion in Dell, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 4:30 am
In re Jamster Marketing Litigation, MDL No. 1751, U.S.D.C. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 8:49 am by Arnold Wadsworth Coggins
Opinion No. 20190748-CA Filed December 24, 2020 Second District Court, Farmington Department The Honorable Michael Edwards No. 134701192 Jonathan Hibshman, Marco Brown, and Rodney R. [read post]
13 May 2016, 9:30 am by azatty
And if you’re curious about whether you or others are a good fit for this BLI thing, read the information below. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 2:50 pm by Kirk Jenkins
Edward Hospital, No. 112898 – Are actual agency and apparent agency separate claims for purposes of the res judicata doctrine and the prohibition against claim-splitting set forth by the Supreme Court in Hudson v. [read post]