Search for: "In re INITIATIVE PETITION NO. 2"
Results 1381 - 1400
of 1,946
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2012, 8:18 am
Otherwise, it wrongly denotes mere coincidence.Next we move on to 2) Literally. [read post]
4 Mar 2012, 8:18 am
Otherwise, it wrongly denotes mere coincidence.Next we move on to 2) Literally. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 5:08 am
2, 2004) Legis. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 12:07 pm
The trial court initially stated that this latter question was outside of its jurisdiction but seems to have reversed course. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 3:00 am
As I've said before, if you're a petitioner in a dissolution proceeding you need to load up your petition (or supplemental affidavits) with as many facts as are available in support of your claims; bare "notice" pleading will not suffice. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 11:48 pm
initiative. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 9:02 am
Eckstein, who filed the limitation complaint on January 18, 2010, argued that the six-month period should have started on December 2, 2009, when Jackson made his initial settlement demand for $3 million. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 7:56 am
Following the Ninth Circuit's lead, see In re B. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 9:39 am
And maybe he or she is; the initial burden of safely crossing an intersection falls on the person who entered into another driver’s right of way. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 7:42 am
In a response to a petition filed by Earthjustice and 120 other organizations, EPA stated that it “believe[s] there is value in initiating a proposed rulemaking process using TSCA authorities to obtain data on chemical substances and mixtures used in hydraulic fracturing. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 1:59 am
Whether we're talking about unpasteurized Stilton, raw oysters or working for organized crime 'associates,' food, for me, as always been an adventure. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 8:02 am
You're probably shocked to learn that a petition like this is even needed. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 8:02 am
You're probably shocked to learn that a petition like this is even needed. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 5:40 am
SOPA, PIPA, Internet Blackout Day, front page stories in newspapers all across the country, 8 million or so emails pouring into the White House, 2 million #sopa tweets, 10 million signatures added to online petitions opposing the bills, . . . followed, of course, by the announcement that these various legislative proposals for combating online infringement1 had been taken off the table “for further study. [read post]
11 Feb 2012, 10:14 am
In In re Derrick Dewayne Gordon, Ch. 11 Case No. 11-62509, 2012 Bankr. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 5:00 am
You’re dead. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 3:45 pm
If you’re such an employee, you’d be wise to keep your mouth shut on such matters, whether it comes to letters to the editor, to blog posts, to yard signs, to campaign donations, or to signatures on initiative or referendum petitions (in states that disclose such signatures). [read post]
Review of the Effects of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act on Third Party Participation Applicants
1 Feb 2012, 9:15 am
§ 102(b)(2). [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 12:49 pm
The circumstances and gravity of the offense alleged in the petition to have been committed by the minor. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 12:50 pm
So if DOC petitions the CAFC for an en banc re-hearing, then appeals the case to the Supreme Court after the CAFC rejects the re-hearing request, all possible appeals might not be foreclosed - and Congress might not be forced to act - until October 1, 2012! [read post]
