Search for: "In the Interest of SB"
Results 1381 - 1400
of 1,929
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Oct 2011, 12:17 pm
Hawaii SB 1310 (1999) Repeals judiciary salary commission. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 10:53 am
If you’re interested in attending, please contact Stephanie Stephens, Operations Coordinator, Medicaid/CHIP Division, for more information at stephanie.stephens@hhsc.state.tx.us. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 6:25 am
At issue is how the Bar is interpreting a law known as SB 94. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 7:18 am
On November 2012 ballot Florida As with Arizona, the Florida interest in changing the mandatory retirement age was connected to changes to judicial selection. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 9:34 am
" He may be right.One hearing that should be interesting in the wake of passage of SB 122 this session will be when the committee studies and makes recommendations "regarding the current procedures used in the testing of DNA evidence in Texas. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 12:00 pm
For your reference, here's a quick look at three law news items drawing particular interest on the JD Supra network during this last week of October:1. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 6:08 am
September 2011 Special Session SB 14 interest rates on judgments in certain civil actions. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 6:00 am
However, proposed projects on farmland tend to spur opposition from agricultural interests worried about the loss of productive farmland in the state, as well as from endangered species advocates concerned about the destruction of farms that provide critical habitat for endangered and threatened species. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 7:57 am
I have been teaching a series of workshops in the mountains focused on the Responsible Governance Policies (commonly referred to as “SB 100 Policies”) which homeowners’ associations (“HOAs”) in Colorado are required to adopt under the Colorado Common Interest Ownership Act (“CCIOA”). [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 9:35 am
In light of this fact, perhaps the most interesting thing to watch in the wake of SB 398’s passage just might be the reaction of California localities to the extension of AB 1743’s safe-harbor exemption. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 3:10 pm
For interesting predictions on the voter backlash that is sure to accompany the ruling, whichever party prevails, see Charles Lane’s post on the Washington Post’s Blog. 3. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 1:20 pm
-Adrian Adams RENTER FEES An interesting ruling was issued on Friday. [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 2:23 pm
While most of the other loans in the other campaigns were non-commercial and no-interest, Esther Jimenez took a $3,800 loan from Arrowhead Credit Union at 9.9% interest. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 9:55 am
SB 398 clarifies that placement agents include those that market interests in any type of private investment fund (not just marketing investment management services), including private equity funds, hedge funds, venture capital funds, and real-estate funds. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 11:54 pm
LawForChange: New on LawForChange.org: Don't wait for the crowd: legalization of #crowdfunding could take a while law4.ch/qnV1EC LawPivot: Top Ten Legal Mistakes of Startup and Earlystage Companies: The following is an article written by Dana Shultz ... bit.ly/piEwEF [much of this is applicable to nonprofits too] For more interesting tweets, follow me and Emily on Twitter. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 4:48 pm
The newly enacted and immediately effective SB 398 changes the current law to this extent: 1. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 9:55 am
Description This Period YTD 7/15/2011 Tom Brickley Construction Rent for HQ 600 600 7/15/2011 Osvaldo Garcia, SB Dentist Rent for HQ 600 600 7/15/2011 Doug Debois, SB Insurance Agent Rent for HQ 600 600 7/15/2011 Jack Katzman, SB Property Manager Rent for HQ 600 600 9/2/2011 Power Pac Voter Fund, SF Field Coordinator 2500 2500 SubTotal: 4900 The largest nonmonetary contribution is from the Power Pac Voter Fund. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 9:50 am
Just a reminder -- SB 657 does not actually require companies to make a single change to their supply chains. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 4:37 pm
Section 69 of SB 405, amending NRS 86.401, specifies that the charging order is the “exclusive remedy” by which a creditor of a member “may satisfy a judgment out of the member’s interest…whether the limited-liability company has one member or more than one member. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 11:30 am
Section 69 of SB 405, amending NRS 86.401, specifies that the charging order is the “exclusive remedy” by which a creditor of a member “may satisfy a judgment out of the member’s interest…whether the limited-liability company has one member or more than one member. [read post]
