Search for: "John Does 1-10 " Results 1381 - 1400 of 4,301
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 May 2009, 4:22 pm
  Patently-O announced on January 6, 2009, that Dudas would be stepping down by mid-January, which does not appear to have happened. [read post]
8 May 2008, 7:51 pm
John Does 1-10, No. 1:2008cv00734; filed March 20, 2008; assigned to J. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 11:45 am by Gary Becker
Even the ratio of government debt to GDP does not measure the size of the government’s impact on the economy. [read post]
31 Jul 2016, 6:07 pm by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
  He concluded the evidence does not clearly and convincingly establish that Helen Weste, when she met with her attorney on February 13, 2002 [sic], after preparing in her own handwriting a document setting forth her testamentary intent, and on March 14, 2002[1], when she signed a [w]ill which Mr. [read post]
18 May 2015, 8:57 am by WIMS
Circuit, Case No. 13-1250 & 1253 Turlock contends that the Project does not fall within FERC's licensing jurisdiction. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 8:10 am
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2013)In 2010, the faculty at Penn State Law approved the creation of a new concept course, to be named "Elements of Law". [read post]
23 Nov 2019, 2:31 pm by Bill Marler
  If romaine lettuce does not have information about harvest region or does not indicate that it has been grown indoors (i.e., hydroponically- and greenhouse-grown), throw it away or return it to the place of purchase. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 8:29 am by Dennis Crouch
Patent No. 1,877,504, issued to Dow Chemical employees John Grebe and Ross Sanford on September 12, 1932. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 4:44 am by Susan Brenner
  JH opened Dad's Limewire Tunes and observed files with names that prompted her to call the Washington County Sheriff's Office a little before 10:45 p.m. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 2:00 pm
  Registration does not imply endorsement. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 11:48 am by John L. Welch
Section 2(a) - disparagement: Precedential No. 10: Divided TTAB Panel Affirms 2(a) Disparagement Refusal of "KHORAN" for Wines Section 2(c) - lack of consent from living individual: Presidential No. 44: In Rare Section 2(c) Ruling, TTAB Affirms Refusal of "OBAMA BAHAMA PAJAMAS" Section 2(d) - likelihood of confusion: Precedential No. 50: TTAB Says Consent and License from Registrant Require Reversal of 2(d) Refusal of WACKER NEUSON over NEUSON for MachineryPrecedential… [read post]