Search for: "Land v. United States"
Results 1381 - 1400
of 6,678
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Mar 2010, 12:27 pm
The latest foray by federal courts into the anachronistic (and often bizarre) legal analysis of who qualifies as an “Indian” comes from the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in its decision in the case of United States v. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 10:32 pm
United States District Court Judge William B. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 6:59 am
Yesterday, the Court heard arguments in United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 5:21 pm
United States, 444 U.S. 164 (1979), which involved Oahu's Kuapa Pond, and issues of uncompensated public access. [read post]
14 May 2009, 2:40 pm
Wrote Whatley, "In interpreting the Full Faith and Credit Clause, the United States Supreme Court has held that '[a] final judgment in one State, if rendered by a court with adjudicatory authority over the subject matter and persons governed by the judgment, qualifies for recognition throughout the land," citing Baker v. [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 5:46 pm
Hughes v City of Eugene, 305 Or. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 9:43 am
Petitioners challenge a 2-1 panel decision issued by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, affirming a rule issued by the U.S. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 6:05 am
November 18, 2016: Today, the Pawnee Nation of Oklahoma, and tribal member Walter Echo-Hawk, filed suit against the United States Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) and Bureau of Land Management (BLM) to challenge federal oil and gas approvals on Pawnee lands. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 2:26 pm
Co. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 9:29 am
.* State Courts Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2014state.htmlCases featured: State v. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 5:14 pm
(Eugene Volokh) A bit of digging into United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 12:01 am
United States, No. 08-497 (cert. petition filed Oct. 15, 2008) - the Federal Circuit held that the seizure as evidence was not a taking for public use because the seizure was an exercise of the government's "police power," and not an exercise of eminent domain. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 8:06 pm
However, because the Shelton opinion is not binding upon them until it becomes the law of the land, as declared by the United States Supreme Court, each State court (that is, each Judge) may decide things differently. 3.) [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 5:40 am
In response, the Defendants claimed that the State Laws were preempted by federal law, namely, the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution and the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (“RLUIPA”). [read post]
17 Mar 2019, 1:08 pm
Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 6:24 am
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada. [read post]
3 May 2013, 1:11 pm
United States v. [read post]
29 Nov 2014, 12:00 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 2:43 pm
A CAAF grant in United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 11:13 am
United States, No. 2011-5001 (Fed. [read post]
