Search for: "Law v. USA" Results 1381 - 1400 of 6,904
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Oct 2019, 12:55 am by Jeffrey H. Brochin
Therefore the TTAB was correct in granting the petition of competitor Ambev S.A. to cancel the mark due to abandonment (Cervejaria Petropolis SA v. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 4:33 pm by Aaron Mackey
Even as to this requirement – which was already what the law required -- there are several exceptions and loopholes. [read post]
10 Oct 2019, 4:17 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed for The New York Times (subscription required), Linda Greenhouse writes that “[u]nder the rules that normally govern the American judicial system, the Louisiana abortion law at the center of [June Medical Services v. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 9:44 am by Dennis Crouch
Berkheimer, No. 18-415 (fact-law divide in eligibility) (waiting for views of Solicitor General) Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA Inc., et al. v. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
The first two cases, Bostock v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 9:33 am by Jeffrey Mitchell
  The NTIA Broadband USA main page (scroll down) features a state-by-state summary of state broadband programs. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 6:02 am by Thorsten Bausch
This means that it was null and of no effect: see, if authority were needed, R (UNISON) v Lord Chancellor [2017] UKSC 51, para 119. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 1:09 am by INFORRM
  Thus, the offending search results will continue to appear against complainant’s name in the USA, Canada, South Africa, Australia, Japan etc. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 4:08 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed for USA Today, Anita Milanovich argues that in R.G. [read post]