Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 1381 - 1400
of 3,574
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Oct 2018, 1:00 am
R (Hallam) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Nealon) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 8-9 May 2018. [read post]
27 Apr 2007, 11:45 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 1:48 am
ZS v DP on issue of mens rea in unlawful carnal knowledge. [read post]
22 May 2015, 4:00 am
The defendant relied on the judgment of Lord Dyson in the Supreme Court case of R (Lumba) v Secretary of State for the Home Department ([2012] 1 AC 245 [101]), in which he disapproved the concept of “vindicatory damages”. [read post]
9 Oct 2010, 5:10 pm
This is illustrated by the recent decision of the Court of Appeal (Lord Neuberger MR, Moses and Mumby LJJ) in Imerman v. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 1:29 am
[This is substantially changed - previously stated (at "sixthly") there are no grounds for presuming that duplication of proceedings would be, without further reason, grounds for a stay.] [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 2:34 am
The panel consisted of Lady Hale and Lords Clarke, Wilson, Carnwath and Hodge. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 11:39 am
Particularly, the agreement between GW and Otsuka stated that it was governed by New York Law. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am
The ECHR in McCann v UK (see our notes here and here) preferred Lord Bingham's approach. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am
The ECHR in McCann v UK (see our notes here and here) preferred Lord Bingham's approach. [read post]
26 Dec 2007, 12:31 am
Lord Justice Longmore (who gave the leading judgment) stated that the whole purpose of the balance achieved by the Bermuda Form (English arbitration but applying New York law to issues arising under the policy) was that judicial remedies in respect of the award should only be those permitted by English law. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 2:00 am
He is also incorrect to suggest that it makes any difference whether an appellate court, when rejecting an Edwards v Bairstow challenge, expresses its agreement with the conclusion of the fact-finding tribunal or states only that the tribunal was entitled to reach that conclusion on the material before it. [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 4:55 am
In considering the appeal, Lord Justice Patten examined many other apportionment methods that had been substantiated by ECJ case law: The “direct and immediate link” test (C-4/94 BLP Group v Customs and Excise Commissioners [1995] STC 424). [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 12:40 am
On #1, it was held by the Court of Appeal that the result of that decision was not to confer extra-EU jurisdiction, but merely to uphold judicial co-operation between European member states’ courts. [read post]
20 May 2019, 1:00 am
The proposed panel for hand down is Lord Reed, Lord Carnwarth and Lady Arden. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 7:55 am
In 1948 Lord Reid (formerly James Reid KC), and in 1949 Lord Radcliffe (formerly Cyril Radcliffe KC) were both made Lords of Appeal in Ordinary without previously serving as judges, and both went on to make famous contributions to English common law. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 5:20 am
The unusual situation of a judge in a civil case deciding whether a party is guilty of murder has arisen before: in Halford v Brookes ([1992] P.I.Q.R. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 8:33 am
There have been quite a few “Halliburton” appeals in the last couple of decades and at least one example in the House of Lords/Supreme Court (Conor v Angiotech [2008]). [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 4:15 pm
He said out of the blue “Thank the good Lord for Mapp v. [read post]
3 Nov 2021, 9:55 am
Held – appeal dismissed Lord Stephens considered the appellants three grounds of appeal in turn. [read post]
