Search for: "MATTER OF ADOPTION OF A J R" Results 1381 - 1400 of 1,716
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Nov 2010, 1:59 am by INFORRM
 In relation to this,  Lord Justice Maurice Kay held; “I simply do not accept that the judge, who is steeped in litigation of this kind, failed to have regard to any of these matters. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 1:19 pm by Garry J. Wise, Wise Law Office, Toronto
Graef, 2010 ONSC 4479 (CanLII)SCOTT , J.[1] Mobility is the issue for consideration in this matter. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 10:28 am by Steve Bainbridge
This article argues that the Delaware supreme court's decision was wrong both as a doctrinal and a policy matter. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 12:57 am by Kevin LaCroix
I am pleased to reproduce below the latest guest post submission. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 6:31 am by Andrew Dickinson
Owen J found that it did (see para. 30 of his judgment), but it may be doubted whether a scheme of this kind for compensating victims of anti-social conduct from public funds was intended to fall within the ambit of the Regulation. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 3:57 am by INFORRM
The difference between the two causes of action can be critical, as John Terry found to his cost: Terry (formerly LNS) v Persons Unknown [2010] EMLR 16 (Tugendhat J). [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 10:30 am by Steve Bainbridge
Managerial decisionmaking biases will not disappear simply because the state adopts a mandatory disclosure regime. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 6:09 pm by Anita Anand
Substantial gains could be achieved by establishing efficient and effective Canada-wide securities regulation, but governments to date have not agreed on the appropriate model to adopt. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 8:09 am by Kara OBrien
  The proposal includes transition provisions that companies may rely on until final rules are adopted. [read post]
17 Oct 2010, 1:04 pm by David Kopel
This understanding (which might have been incorrect as a matter of English law) was adopted by the American Framers, and carried forward by antebellum state courts. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 3:03 pm by NL
“The duty in s.49A applies both when the local authority is drawing up its criteria and when it applies them in an individual case, both of those being an aspect of carrying out its functions”: per Black J in R (JL) v. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 4:35 am by pete.black@gmail.com (Peter Black)
  In a podcast at the May It Please The Court Weblog, J Craig Williams and guests discusses who is responsible for Clementi's death. [read post]