Search for: "MATTER OF C B J B" Results 1381 - 1400 of 3,062
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Feb 2023, 7:38 pm by Michael Froomkin
Perspectives de droit comparé (Céline Castets-Renard, Jessica Eynard, eds.) which should be forthcoming shortly. [read post]
21 May 2023, 9:00 pm by Neil H. Buchanan and Michael C. Dorf
The President has to keep the pressure on Republicans to relent, which means that he has to keep everyone in suspense about what he will do if (or as seems increasingly likely when) they refuse to budge.The Strategy Now: Brace for Blowback No Matter What Biden DoesOr maybe not. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 12:44 am by John Collins
It was therefore said to lack utility under section 18(1)(c) of the Patents Act. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 9:09 am by J
Ltd v Kintex Shareholding Company [2004] EWHC 1599 (Comm), per Cooke J at [7];(b) s.81 can be satisfied by court determination, or Tribunal decision or arbitration. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 9:09 am by J
Ltd v Kintex Shareholding Company [2004] EWHC 1599 (Comm), per Cooke J at [7];(b) s.81 can be satisfied by court determination, or Tribunal decision or arbitration. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 8:22 am by Giles Peaker
If a policy amounts to indirect discrimination against group E, I do not consider that it is an answer for the policy maker to say that it has considered groups A, B, C and D. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 8:10 am
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2013)In 2010, the faculty at Penn State Law approved the creation of a new concept course, to be named "Elements of Law". [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 4:49 am
The matter came before Foster J again on 7 February 2012: SL6 Limited v Fat Duck Pty Ltd [2012] FCA 71 (7 February 2012). [read post]
25 Sep 2023, 9:30 am by Keith Szeliga and Emily Theriault
The DCAM encourages the audit team to discuss pertinent factual matters with the contractor throughout and at the conclusion of the audit; to provide the contractor draft copies of the report exhibits and explanatory notes along with copies of disputed documents and other significant audit evidence; and to provide the contractor an opportunity to respond to the draft audit findings.[25] The DCAM requires a written report for all defective pricing audits.[26] Each audit with a recommended… [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:11 am by MOTP
Should it be based on how the highest court ruled on the matter, which would then—on the particular waiver issue in this example-- result in a tie between the State of Texas (based state common law) and the Fifth Circuit (based on federal common law).Or should the counting and coding be based on how different courts ruled regardless of whether they were ultimately reversed? [read post]