Search for: "MATTER OF C B J B" Results 1381 - 1400 of 3,062
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2016, 3:34 am by Florian Mueller
Further below you can find a very long list of items in the evidentiary record of Oracle v. [read post]
11 May 2016, 6:01 am
The patents in trial B were found invalid for obviousness. [read post]
3 May 2016, 3:50 am by Jan von Hein
The courts where a divorce case between the parents of the child was pending should not exercise ancillary jurisdiction under Article 3 (c) even if under the local law of the court such ancillary jurisdiction was given. [read post]
2 May 2016, 11:44 am by Olivier Moréteau
Maphalle, University of Cape Town (South Africa)·         Judicial Protection of Women’s Matrimonial Property Rights in NigeriaAnthony C. [read post]
1 May 2016, 4:32 am by INFORRM
(To note, as in the later Bestwater case only the legal question posed to the CJEU really matters, Bestwater is not saying much more than Svensson). [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 11:29 am by David Fraser
Having found that s. 4(3)(c) of PIPA applied, the adjudicator determined that that the OIPC had no jurisdiction to consider the matter further: [para 22] However, my authority under the Act is to determine whether the collection, use or disclosure of personal information was for journalistic purposes only. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 4:00 am by Ray Dowd
If, on a motion under Rule 12(b)(6) or 12(c), matters outside the pleadings are presented to and not excluded by the court, the motion must be treated as one for summary judgment under Rule 56. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 4:00 am by Ray Dowd
If, on a motion under Rule 12(b)(6) or 12(c), matters outside the pleadings are presented to and not excluded by the court, the motion must be treated as one for summary judgment under Rule 56. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 4:00 am by Ray Dowd
If, on a motion under Rule 12(b)(6) or 12(c), matters outside the pleadings are presented to and not excluded by the court, the motion must be treated as one for summary judgment under Rule 56. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 7:18 am
Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit 2015) (Gorsuch, J., concurring). [read post]