Search for: "MATTER OF H C R" Results 1381 - 1400 of 1,509
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2022, 4:50 pm by INFORRM
  There was a post on the Privacy Matters blog. [read post]
4 Mar 2018, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
Journlaw has been in conversation with two European media law professors: Emeritus Professor Dirk Voorhoof (University of Ghent) and Dr Inger Høedt-Rasmussen (University of Copenhagen). [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 1:37 pm
This post examines an opinion from the Court of Appeals of Texas, El Paso: O’Brien v. [read post]
26 Oct 2008, 5:58 am
On May 13, 2008, during the annual meeting of Overstock.com shareholders, Audit Committee Chairperson Allison H. [read post]
20 Jan 2019, 11:43 pm
A court’s authority to compel arbitration under the Act does not extend to all private contracts, no matter how emphatically they may express a preference for arbitration. [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 4:00 am by Mandelman
It was a highly specialized program that had started at Oxford University in England and then had come to Harvard, before being funded by H&R Block, and brought to UMKC. [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 1:11 pm by Hedge Fund Lawyer
Moreover, CPOs should thoroughly document the activation and application of any relevant business continuity policy in response to COVID-19 as the matter could easily become an item of interest on future NFA exams. [read post]
14 Aug 2006, 12:11 pm
As I've previously written, the armed services are subject to standards far more restrictive than those found in Common Article 3 -- under the Uniform Code of Military Justice and the Army Field Manual (which they must apply, as a matter of statutory law). [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 11:37 am by R. Grace Rodriguez, Esq.
Most Cited CasesA general demurrer in an answer is sufficient to preserve a statute of frauds objection.[5] KeyCite Citing References for this Headnote 118A Declaratory Judgment 118AIII Proceedings 118AIII(H) Appeal and Error 118Ak392 Appeal and Error 118Ak393 k. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 6:04 am by Christopher G. Hill
  The USGCD eventually notified the individuals that the USGBC had looked into the matter and found everything to be fine. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 5:00 am by Don Cruse
As a threshold matter, the Court first discussed whether each was “an employee of a governmental unit” within the scope of § 101.106(f). [read post]
2 May 2011, 5:29 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
Substantive versus Procedural Theories of Private Judging Christopher R. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 4:22 pm by INFORRM
It would repeal section 512(m) and effectively impose a 24-7-365 monitoring obligation on all OSPs, no matter their size or available resources. [read post]