Search for: "Mark C. Good"
Results 1381 - 1400
of 5,962
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2014, 2:59 pm
Mark Rienzi, who won last week’s McCullen v. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 3:28 am
The first is Case T-221/12, now renumbered as Case C-142/14 P, The Sunrider Corporation v OHIM. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 6:00 am
Claggett's legal team was supported by Robson Forensic, Inc. including testimony from Mark E. [read post]
7 May 2019, 3:56 am
It ruled that a trademark owner cannot claim for information against an auction portal to disclose information about entities selling goods and about the quantity and prices paid for these goods, as this claim is inconsistent with the Constitution. [read post]
22 May 2017, 9:32 am
Lollicup USA, Inc., 2017 WL 2152424, No. 16 C 8041 (N.D. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 4:02 am
The IPKat's venerable friend Richard Ashmead -- a man who has done more than pretty well anyone else on the planet to draw attention to problems caused by class headings in trade mark applications and to suggest sensible solutions to them -- has not forgotten the fact that the IP TRANSLATOR trade mark application by the Chartered Institute of Patent Attorneys (CIPA) [on which see the myriad Katposts listed here] remains unresolved. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 2:41 am
Good luck, Claudia! [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 7:11 am
"Examining Attorney Tracy C. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:45 am
In each of the 19 chapters of the book, the contributors evaluate an area of reform in IP that they deem a priority in relation to the public good. [read post]
15 Feb 2007, 2:56 pm
`(C) Any noncommercial use of a mark. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 12:04 pm
Those are good source identifiers.Rebecca Tushnet, Georgetown UniversityNo, those are very good expressive messages about the person wearing the T-shirt, not good source identifiers—PTO denies rights to I heart DC, etc. on a regular basis b/c it’s good information not good source identification. [read post]
9 Feb 2019, 2:13 am
| The Opinion of the Advocate General in the case C-443/17 (Abraxis case). [read post]
27 Apr 2007, 11:45 am
" Id. at 758 (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 4:35 am
” The marks have to be considered as they’re encountered in the marketplace, including Overstock’s stylization of its mark. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 4:10 pm
Fragment: Decretales Gregorii IX, with glossDate: c. 1275-1325Found in: Massa, Antonio. [read post]
11 Mar 2007, 8:20 am
A "quick and dirty" translation of the reasoning of the Advocate General in the LIMONCHELO dispute, Case C- 344/05 P OHIM v Shaker (see earlier post by the IPKat here), comes from Stéphane Ambrosini (Tomkins & Co, Dublin): "24. [read post]
28 Feb 2006, 11:42 pm
The Board accords very broad protection to "famous" marks under Section 2(d), so it was good to see the Board raise the bar for proof of fame in this context. [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 6:09 am
Merken BV v Hagelkruis Beheer BV, Case C-149/11 indicates the use needed to support an EU registration, as follows:a) Territorial scope of use is one of the relevant factors;b) It cannot be ruled out that use in a single member state can support an EU registration;c) Use needs to be sufficient or create or maintain a market share;d) No de minimus level of use can be defined.Other factors to consider include the scale and frequency of use, the nature of use, and the nature of the… [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 1:46 am
A good example is the fate of the Guinness mark. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 2:49 am
" The fact that the cited mark is contained in the applied-for mark increases the similarity between the two. [read post]
