Search for: "Mark C. Good"
Results 1381 - 1400
of 5,962
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Apr 2020, 4:41 pm
COVID-19 has again exposed the power of the space, which marks the confines of the legalization of politics, the judicialization of political contests around fundamental issues of morals, ethics, social norms, and international relations. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 4:10 am
A TTAB Administrative Trademark Judge once said to me that one can predict the outcome of a Section 2(d) appeal 95% of the time just by looking at the marks and the involved goods or services. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 1:46 am
The necessity of a ‘link’ is not explicitly mentioned in Article 8(5) EUTMR but has been established through case law, notably in C-408/01, Adidas and C-252/07, Intel.Since the contested goods in Class 28 include decorations for Christmas trees, toys, games, appliances for gymnastics and toy for animals, the Opposition Division also considered that the goods may display a link with the opponent’s reputed goods in Class 16 as the former… [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 4:00 am
Beyond the utility of virtual hearings as short term emergency measures, there is reason to believe that this moment may well mark the start of a shift toward increased use of virtual hearings in the longer term. [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 2:02 am
I have a good example of this. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 12:08 pm
Sante Conte, resident in Napoli, filed for the largely banal figurative mark depicted below for various food and beverage goods and services.The EUIPO refused it on the basis that it was devoid of distinctive character. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 7:23 am
And it does lead directly to the question of whether there are inter creditor duties that apply in such a context (my good friends, Bratton and Levitin have some very relevant views (here)). [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 2:59 am
However, with the right trade mark strategy and good evidence this is a move forward in the battle against lookalikes. [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 1:25 am
He thus “wholeheartedly” agreed with the Opinion of AG Bobek in C-220/15:In accordance with the prohibition of contra legem interpretation and the principle of the separation of powers, a dynamic or teleological interpretation is only possible where ‘the text of the provision itself [is] open to different interpretations, presenting some degree of textual ambiguity and vagueness’.Albeit that one of the objectives of the Enforcement Directive and, with that,… [read post]
10 Apr 2020, 10:27 am
… [N]o known technology guarantees the secrecy, security, and verifiability of a marked ballot transmitted over the Internet. [read post]
10 Apr 2020, 5:52 am
Today marks officially marks four weeks for me working from home. [read post]
10 Apr 2020, 3:34 am
A TTAB Administrative Trademark Judge once said to me that one can predict the outcome of a Section 2(d) appeal 95% of the time just by looking at the marks and the involved goods or services. [read post]
6 Apr 2020, 4:14 pm
Wyoming: On April 3rd, Governor Mark Gordon issued a Statewide Directive for individuals arriving in Wyoming from another state of country to self-quarantine. [read post]
4 Apr 2020, 6:16 am
They might well point to a contradiction between the practice of these cultural presumptions about the alignment of age and death, with the fundamental concepts of human dignity and the value of life irrespective of life's inevitable march toward death (a march usually marked by age). [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 8:06 am
§ 1125(c)(3)(C); see A.R.S. [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 3:26 am
We are delighted to host this guest post from Ian Gill, who has been combing through recent decisions by the Appointed Person, one of the two routes of appeal in respect of trade mark and (more rarely) design decisions made by the UK Intellectual Property Office...The odds are not good. [read post]
1 Apr 2020, 2:31 am
1. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 12:13 pm
By: Stacey C. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 9:19 am
In addition to small business concerns eligible under the existing provisions of the SB Act, under the proposed amendments to the SB Act provided for in the CARES Act, the following additional business concerns may be eligible to receive a PPP loan: any business concern; 501 (c)(3) nonprofit organizations (excluding those that receive Medicaid reimbursements); 501(c)(19) veterans’ organizations; or Tribal business concern described in Section 31(b)(2)(C) of the SB… [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 4:59 am
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION AT COLUMBUS In re: NASHEL : : : : : Jose J. [read post]
