Search for: "Martin v. People"
Results 1381 - 1400
of 1,616
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2023, 12:16 am
On Tuesday morning during Oral Questions in the Commons, the Secretary of State for Justice said this in reply to a supplementary question from Martin Docherty-Hughes (West Dunbartonshire, SNP): “We have made it clear that we would not rule out ever withdrawing from the ECHR in the future”. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 3:30 am
And the number of people employed on the base, many of them employees of Lockheed Martin and Northrop Grumman, is due to increase from 1,800 to 2,500 in 2015, according to a study done in Britain. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 3:34 am
It’s amazing how people ascribe brilliance to a lawyer when his adversary is loathed for reasons having nothing to do with his efforts. [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 4:52 am
She also took on Courtney Martin, who blogs at feministing and is the author of Perfect Girls, Starving Daughters. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 9:13 am
See Catherine Martin Christopher, Will Filing Status Be Portable? [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 9:03 pm
Supreme Court’s decision last June in West Virginia v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 4:37 am
See McZeal v. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 11:45 am
(With the limited exception of Cooper v. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 9:11 am
The numbers were significant: 47 million people participating in 417,000 plans with approximately $2.5 trillion in assets. [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 9:55 am
Nomination of Directors Last year's AFSCME v. [read post]
19 Aug 2007, 7:22 pm
"This more or less legalizes the N.S.A. program," said Kate Martin, director of the Center for National Security Studies in Washington, who has studied the new legislation. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 2:53 am
"You tell Martin to get rid of that tape or there's gonna be people getting DUIs," she quoted Abbate as telling her, according to the transcript. [read post]
19 Aug 2007, 6:04 pm
“This more or less legalizes the N.S.A. program,” said Kate Martin, director of the Center for National Security Studies in Washington, who has studied the new legislation. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 12:00 am
Supreme Court, and both sides have vowed to take Perry v. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 10:35 am
The case, Chason v. [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 12:17 pm
In Harper v. [read post]
19 Jan 2009, 4:00 am
o SCOTUS docket hereRicci v. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 2:52 pm
May 4, 2010) (concluding that a defendant's characterization of a plaintiff as racist "is a subjective assertion, not sufficiently susceptible to being proved true or false to constitute defamation"); Martin v. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 11:31 am
One example, the appellate decision in Rosen v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 9:55 am
Holthaus,, Jr., Note, Ed O’Bannon v. [read post]
