Search for: "Matter of Friedman"
Results 1381 - 1400
of 1,565
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2009, 1:08 pm
It doesn't much matter. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 3:53 am
" In Friedman v. [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 9:19 pm
As a matter of fact people living closer to the nearest wind turbine than 500 meters tend to be more positive about wind turbines than people sited further away from the turbines. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 6:27 am
Howard ignores — is that patients who suffer hard resulting from medical procedures (a risk we all face all the time no matter how perfect our doctors might be) are not provided the financial means to live with that harm: The biggest reason for bringing the most expensive malpractice claims - for example, adverse incidents at birth - is to find some source to pay for long-term care. [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 9:46 am
What constitutes a “derivative” use may be as obscure as any other matter on this topic, but it cannot possibly mean any work that is “derived” from a copyrighted work. [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 9:04 am
Howard Friedman's Religion Clause -- the best news source I've seen for religion-and-the-law matters (both American and foreign) writes:... [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 1:05 pm
Friedman. [read post]
5 Apr 2009, 8:14 am
Friedman believes that big government creates economic inefficiencies ... [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 9:27 am
Greenberg’s self-interest in these matters, his lifetime of self-promotion in the interests of building an immense personal fortune, and his rank hypocrisy are legendary. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 2:47 pm
I’m not sure where I go t the nerve to believe I have something worth saying on these matters, but it is gratifying when I find out that I’m not entirely empty-headed. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 7:15 am
But whether justifying torture or opposing perfectly reasonable people who happened to oppose the justification of torture, there seems to be a remarkable willingness to rely on the hope that whatever one says, no matter how empty or absurd, will have an impact. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 8:01 pm
Collins and Herbert seem to have their hearts in the right place, but their columns too frequently add up to nothing.My overwhelmingly negative reaction to David Brooks has not been based (at least as a first-order matter) on his conservative views. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 5:45 am
Friedman, and Justin R. [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 3:42 pm
I cannot but help save a special contempt, however, for the lawyers who — it is obvious to me in looking at the purported justifications for their conclusions — were obeying orders to come up with any justification, no matter how baseless, for what their bosses wanted to do. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 10:03 pm
Friedman wrote:[T]he court ... finds that Orthomon's statements are not reasonably susceptible of a defamatory connotation. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 5:14 am
(citing Friedman v. [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 8:35 am
It has become the principal judge of law school quality and it doesn’t matter whether its judgments are legitimate or not. [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 5:27 am
I do not claim to be an expert on these matters, but I am smart enough to follow the money and the trails of contract obligations, and I’m not quite sure where my logic fails. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 2:18 pm
” But practicing law isn’t just a matter of knowing the law. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
(Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) (Patent Prospector) (Patent Docs) (Patent Baristas) (Intellectual Property Watch) (Law360) (BLOG@IP::JUR) (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) (Patently-O) (Inventive Step) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Techdirt) (Hal Wegner) Reactions to Patent Reform Bill 2009 (IP Watchdog) (Patent Baristas) (IP Watchdog) (IP Watchdog) (Patently-O) Worries about our patent system (The Invent Blog) US Patents Licensing Executives Society urges… [read post]
