Search for: "Newman, Appeal of" Results 1381 - 1400 of 1,629
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Feb 2012, 5:50 am by pete.black@gmail.com (Peter Black)
" pjblack.me/z1AQtl from @wired: "Forcing Defendant to Decrypt Hard Drive Is Unconstitutional, Appeals Court Rules"pjblack.me/zKaAzJ "How Storify And Pinterest Are Cultivating The Wild Web, And Why Social Media Will Civilize The Internet" pjblack.me/AwY9AC it's good to see the washington post keep innovating: "Washington Post Tests Personalized News Program" pjblack.me/yNpKJ5 pew research into "Privacy management on social media… [read post]
19 Oct 2017, 4:20 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Having had a full and adequate opportvnity to litigate the issue, Gourary may not now attempt to relitigate an issue “which [was] raised and determined against [him] or which could have been raised on a prior appeal. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 9:48 pm by Aaron Barkoff
In dissent, Judge Newman found the majority's ruling to be in error because "the portion of the FDA label in which a product's properties are described is irrelevant to whether the patent is infringed. . . . [read post]
23 Sep 2016, 12:32 pm by Dennis Crouch
 On appeal, the Federal Circuit has reversed. [read post]
22 May 2012, 7:09 am by Nabiha Syed
Sawyers, the Court held that the position of the Board of Immigration Appeals that an alien seeking cancellation of removal must individually satisfy the requirements of 8 U.S.C. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 6:15 pm
Judge Newman offers a poignant concurring opinion. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 11:07 am by Jason Rantanen
  Ortho-McNeil and Photocure, both authored by Judge Newman and issued on the same day, provide an interesting contrast on this issue. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 9:03 pm by Scott McKeown
Decisional units can be earned by participation in non-AIA proceedings, and there is a significant backlog of ex parte appeals. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 8:31 am by Stefanie Levine
The Federal Circuit first decided Classen’s appeal in 2008, when a panel comprised of Circuit Judges Newman and Moore and District Judge Farnan (sitting by designation) held in a one-paragraph, non-precedential decision authored by Judge Moore that Classen’s claims do not satisfy 35 USC § 101. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 8:31 am by Stefanie Levine
The Federal Circuit first decided Classen’s appeal in 2008, when a panel comprised of Circuit Judges Newman and Moore and District Judge Farnan (sitting by designation) held in a one-paragraph, non-precedential decision authored by Judge Moore that Classen’s claims do not satisfy 35 USC § 101. [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 3:45 pm
does not appeal either point. [read post]
26 Sep 2009, 7:52 am
Newman Issue: Whether the Sixth Circuit erred in granting habeas relief and applying the "reasonable speculation" rule, when the Michigan state court had applied the Jackson v. [read post]