Search for: "Parcell v. State"
Results 1381 - 1400
of 1,744
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Apr 2021, 1:01 am
Vélez-Ibañez and Josiah Heyman, The U.S. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 3:28 am
The property consists of three contiguous parcels with a footprint of about 42,000 square feet. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 3:28 am
The property consists of three contiguous parcels with a footprint of about 42,000 square feet. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 3:28 am
The property consists of three contiguous parcels with a footprint of about 42,000 square feet. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 10:24 am
Make UC a Good Neighbor v. [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 3:39 am
Chancery Court Summarily Orders Dissolution of Deadlocked LLC GR US Licensing, LP v Seibel, Mem. [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 3:39 am
Chancery Court Summarily Orders Dissolution of Deadlocked LLC GR US Licensing, LP v Seibel, Mem. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 12:34 am
In Lyons the judge stated: For inmates of the state hospital, the freedom to receive food parcels from visitors and to make purchases from an external source are some of the few areas in which they may exercise some sort of personal autonomy or choice. [read post]
26 Dec 2021, 1:23 am
But in this bill, they are part and parcel of a retaliatory, unconstitutional law. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 8:19 am
Co. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 8:55 am
The state and the Park District jointly prepared the Eastshore State Park General Plan. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 10:25 am
State Highway Commission v. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 6:56 am
Magedson, MA v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 11:46 am
Assembly Bill 1307 AB 1307, unanimously passed by the State Legislature and signed by Governor Newsom on September 7, 2023, was crafted in response to the court ruling in Make UC a Good Neighbor v. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 1:35 pm
Supreme Court in an 8-1 decision issued on June 30, 2020, in United States Patent and Trademark Office et al. v. [read post]
9 May 2012, 7:15 am
A state statute, Conn. [read post]
28 Feb 2016, 9:31 pm
The basis for the preliminary injunction were: a First Amendment challenge to the hours-of-operation and beach-drinking ordinances (Counts III and VI); a Dormant Commerce Clause challenge to the Spring Break Ordinances (Count IV); an Equal Protection challenge to the Spring Break Ordinances (Count V); and a state-law land-use-planning challenges to the beach-drinking ordinance (Counts XI–XIV). [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 2:34 am
" News like this can't help but raise thoughts of the 1976 decision, Tarasoff v. [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 9:12 am
Spees v. [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 7:33 am
Grinstein v. [read post]
