Search for: "People v Cooper" Results 1381 - 1400 of 2,878
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2022, 4:50 pm by INFORRM
New Zealand RNZ reports that the High Court in Wellington has ruled Tafara Mutingwende, who goes by the stage name ‘Theo Outlandish’, was defamed by Joshua Cooper-Taepa in an Instagram livestream in October 2020, watched by more than 200 people. [read post]
21 May 2024, 8:17 am by Phil Dixon
An eyewitness reported that one of the people involved was a dreadlocked Black man. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 4:34 pm by INFORRM
Canada In the case of The College of Pharmacists of Manitoba v Jorgenson 2019 MBQB 87 Rempel J ordered a Winnipeg pharmacists to pay $150,000 in damages to his regulatory body which he accused of covering up the deaths of 24 indigenous people. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 4:00 am by INFORRM
(c)             30,000  The highest Award of privacy damages in 2011, Cooper v Turrell [2011] EWHC 3269 (QB)). [read post]
30 Sep 2024, 9:55 am by Joel R. Brandes
The plaintiff alleged that “[t]he bank requires an appraisal for the purposes of negotiations” and that the defendant’s failure to cooperate with an appraisal interferes with his ability to negotiate with the bank, which is necessary to comply with the terms of the parties’ stipulation. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 3:12 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
I could reasonably be accused of being overoptimistic about norms, but good v. destructive/counterproductive/discriminatory/otherwise suboptimal are different things. [read post]
20 May 2016, 2:03 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
When people commit fraud, they use different language. [read post]
3 Mar 2021, 5:01 am by Julia Spiegel
Supreme Court’s 2006 decision in Massachusetts v. [read post]
14 Jan 2012, 5:37 am
Read more here: http://www.miamiherald.com/2012/01/14/v-print/2590198/foundering-of-italian-cruise-ship.html#storylink=cpy [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 3:02 am
The Supreme Court established the constitutional basis for using paid informants in 1966 with U.S. v. [read post]
13 May 2011, 11:29 am
The Court of Appeals addressed this issue in People v Corrigan, 80 NY2d 326. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 2:25 pm by Jonathan Holbrook
Bethel, 854 N.E.2d 150 (Ohio 2006) (“there is substantial authority for the proposition that Miranda warnings are not necessary when counsel is present”); People v. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 11:07 pm
The test was devised by Justice Stewart in United States v. [read post]