Search for: "People v Lord"
Results 1381 - 1400
of 1,806
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Feb 2011, 10:59 pm
In particular, the barrister pays attention to the comments of Lord Hoffman (a former law Lord) who authored the report’s foreward. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 4:05 pm
Lord Justice Jackson has published his own response – in general he welcomes the government’s proposals. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 12:23 pm
Taylor (K.B. 1769); Donaldson v. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 7:07 am
Preface… Before I jump into this decision by a U.S. [read post]
12 Feb 2011, 5:44 am
There were interesting follow up questions from Lord Soley and Lord Prescott. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 3:30 pm
Does this mean I can’t defend guilty people? [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 12:56 pm
Cameron would never flick a V sign at the people of Britain) And on this momentous day for Egypt… Lord Sugar tweets away…. you..really…could not make it up… I haven’t even got the will to use Lord Sugar’s catchphrase in a post mubarka-ironic way…. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 6:19 am
But, as Lord Neuberger pointed out in a speech this week human rights and other aspects of our constitutional tradition can easily become taken for granted, as we become complacent. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 2:30 am
There were hearings in the cases of Hunt v Evening Standard (3 February) and Lord Ashcroft v Independent (3-4 February). [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 7:16 am
Our right to free expression has a natural tension with our right to privacy – see Von Hannover, Campbell v MGN or Mosley v News Group Newspapers. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 10:59 pm
In Gillick v West Norfolk and Wisbech Area Health Authority [1986] 1 FLR 224, HL the House of Lords (now the Supreme Court) held that a girl under 16 could validly consent to contraception “provided that she has sufficient understanding and intelligence to know what they involve“. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 8:35 am
Lord knows how they find the time…to potentially fall under this definition. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 10:00 pm
The Court of Appeal yesterday handed down judgment in the case of JIH v News Group Newspapers Ltd ([2011] EWCA Civ 42). [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 3:01 am
The Court of Appeal today handed down judgment in the case of JIH v News Group Newspapers Ltd ([2011] EWCA Civ 42). [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 2:24 am
In Goldstone v Goldstone & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 39 Lord Justice Thorpe quoted Hedley J in the court below, who had "summarised the litigation in vivid language" thus (at paragraph 42): "1. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 8:53 am
The test is always the view of the objective outsider but applied to the particular facts, circumstances and personalities of the people involved. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 4:00 pm
(Eugene Volokh) The case, Yemshaw v. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 3:24 am
Although the judgement, given by Baroness Hale, did not mention human rights, it clearly impacts on article 8 rights to family life, and alongside the recent decision in Pinnock, could greatly increase the number of people to which local authorities are obliged to provide housing. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 8:57 am
” As the UKSC Blog notes in their review of The Supreme Court in 2010: Joseph v Spiller [2010] UKSC 53. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 3:51 am
XJA v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2010] EWHC 3174 (QB) at [15]. [read post]
