Search for: "People v. Case" Results 1381 - 1400 of 52,286
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Mar 2016, 1:25 pm
You get used to seeing a certain pattern in these types of cases. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 2:30 pm
(There might be an exception when, for example, the defendant has already completed his entire sentence, but this case doesn't involve that scenario.)Here's my only follow-up question for Justice Irion, though.If that's the case, then doesn't the same rule apply to lots of collateral objections by defendants as well? [read post]
26 Jan 2021, 9:30 pm by ernst
In Painting Constitutional Law, scholars of constitutional law analyse the paintings and cases, describing the law surrounding the cases and discussing how Cortada captures these foundational decisions, their people, and their events on canvas. [read post]
23 Mar 2021, 5:35 pm by INFORRM
The fourth section of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) delivered a remarkable judgment in the case of L.B. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 6:30 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Palmer v. 999 Quebec, Inc, a case from the Supreme Court of North Dakota, involved a plaintiff who was born in 1955 and was raised in Duluth, Minnesota. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 2:17 pm by WIMS
Supreme Court issued an important 5-4 decision with the majority opinion written by Justice Kennedy in the case of Citizens United v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 10:56 am
You've got to read this one to believe it.It's a case study in what not to do at oral argument. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 6:17 am by Aaron Lindstrom
 The Court also held one criminal case in abeyance pending its decisions in People v. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 9:51 am by Staff Writer
  In 1994, RICO charges were successfully brought up against pro-life activists in NOW v. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 7:24 am
We'll find out soon.MORE: The first case is a tax case — a 16th Amendment case — Moore v. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 1:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
Facts of Murdock v Pennsylvania The case involved an ordinance enacted by the City of Jeannette, Pennsylvania. [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 9:57 am
  That is the case where the First tells the parents that don't like gay people where to go. [read post]
15 Mar 2015, 9:18 am by INFORRM
” Lord Toulson did not find that in this case it was necessary and proportionate to retain the information relating to Mr Catt. [read post]