Search for: "People v. London"
Results 1381 - 1400
of 1,614
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Oct 2009, 10:35 pm
City of New London, 545 U.S. 469 (2005)? [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 3:24 am
’ This interpretation was in turn rejected by the European Court of Human Rights in Gillan and Quinton v. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 6:35 pm
The information you provide is greatly upsetting to powerful people who would prefer to keep it a secret. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 12:30 am
– Marcus v. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 8:19 am
", he would have assume that they were the people the sheets and towels had been stolen from. [read post]
28 Apr 2013, 5:02 pm
Under the principle in Derbyshire v Times Newspapers, public bodies cannot sue for libel. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 4:00 am
Frankly, rich people with empty homes are not going to be a target of this government. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 12:12 pm
[He once shot bullet holes into the wall in the shape of a V, in honor, he said of Queen Victoria – Ed.]. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 5:00 am
In City of Richmond v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 9:45 am
Last week the IPKat reported on the ruling of the Court of Justice of the European Union in Case C-462/09 Thuiskopie v Opus. [read post]
25 May 2017, 5:00 am
There are people sprinkled throughout the free market and libertarian worlds who have that Grove City/Sennholz connection. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 11:31 am
One example, the appellate decision in Rosen v. [read post]
10 Feb 2024, 1:07 am
Starting at 1:30 PM GMT (London) / 8:30 AM ET (New York). [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 2:28 am
Zöchling v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 4:13 am
He was there before they were, early 1980s when there was only a London Hard Rock and not a protected TM. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 4:46 am
This issue was considered earlier this year n the case of Rock Advertising Limited v MWB Business Exchange Centres Limited. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 4:03 am
Presenters often appear to be ill-briefed and insufficiently armed with the facts necessary to challenge assertions made by interviewees in live interviews, reflecting not just pressure on them but a lack of understanding by programme researchers and producers He also pointed to ‘evidence of a misunderstanding of the political process in the EU’, drawing attention in particular to written evidence submitted by the Labour Party which stated that ‘too often it seems that you report… [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 8:00 am
: (Spicy IP),Recent trends in IP strategy – an excerpt from London talk: (IP ThinkTank),World Customs Organisation recommends far-reaching new rules on IP: (Intellectual Property Watch),Members seek ways to move policy in WIPO Traditional Knowledge Committee: (Intellectual Property Watch)Global - Trade Marks / Domain Names / BrandsXerox – avoiding genericide: (Afro-IP),Big business urges adoption of Anti-Counterfeiting Treaty: (IP Justice),WIPO press release… [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 4:10 am
The civil law relating to clamping was considered by the Court of Appeal (Civil Division) in Vine v London Borough of Waltham Forest.[2000] EWCA Civ 106.In the Vine case, the earlier case of Arthur v Anker and another [1997] QB 564 is discussed.The Vine caseThe appellant in this case was Helen Vine. [read post]
10 Oct 2008, 9:00 pm
Joe Klein, Senator Government V. [read post]
