Search for: "People v. Powers"
Results 1381 - 1400
of 15,263
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jul 2022, 9:00 am
It is a good question.Given how important the Dobbs outcome was to the political movement that installed them in power, one might have thought that each of the five people in the majority would take special care not to, say, insult people's intelligence by citing Ruth Bader Ginsburg in supposed support of their analysis. [read post]
8 May 2025, 8:55 am
It supports the thesis that the "plenary power" dictum of McPherson v. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 7:39 pm
In Thacker v. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 2:06 am
For all the power of the American courts in the era of Brown v Board and Roe v Wade, most Americans would be bemused or shocked at the idea of the Justices choosing their own successors, not the President and the Senate. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 12:38 pm
In NFIB v. [read post]
5 May 2017, 7:51 am
Perhaps one of the most important eminent domain cases in recent years was Kelo v. [read post]
28 Aug 2024, 12:05 pm
Harris on Surveillance The Facts: The government has vast, unprecedented powers to peer into people’s private lives. [read post]
25 May 2007, 4:24 am
Caveat emptor (enter at your own risk).Opinion in the consolidated casePerfect 10 v. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 5:00 am
If Grey is right, the case for serious reform of the Supreme Court in response to Dobbs v. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 10:50 pm
The Defendant had already exercised its powers as to social housing in relation to the Claimants. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 5:41 am
A reader mentioned a claim that I'd heard before, which is that governments can only have powers, and only people can have rights. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 1:01 am
In Lone Wolf v. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 3:58 pm
Ogden and McCulloch v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 3:01 pm
In Matthews v. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 4:05 pm
Even if it did, was the use of the power proportionate to the legitimate aim? [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 12:20 pm
People v. [read post]
10 Sep 2016, 11:31 pm
The Court’s conclusion (at 391) as to the purpose of the section – ‘to create a free trade area throughout [Australia] and to deny to [the Central government] and States alike a power to prevent or obstruct the free movement of people, goods and communications across State boundaries’ – is presented both as the product of this political and drafting history and as justification for departure from the failed interpretive models of the past. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 11:03 am
Article I, Section 2 of the Ohio Constitution (All political power is inherent in the people. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 8:51 am
–Emoji GmbH v. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 11:33 am
” In B.L. v. [read post]
