Search for: "People v. Speed" Results 1381 - 1400 of 2,274
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jul 2013, 5:29 pm by Glotzer & Sweat
 The first case I think is highly relevant is the 1975 California Supreme Court decision of Li v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 10:22 am
[If you want some handy tips on how to speed-read all those comments, try the Wired How-To Wiki, here] In case you missed it, Eli Lilly and Company v Human Genome Sciences, Inc UKSC 2012/0220 is not going on appeal to the United Kingdom's Supreme Court. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 12:14 am by Mischa Popoff
” Book sits in a chair that was once occupied by none other than Miles V. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 12:00 pm
  Those people clearly have been sentenced to probation, after all. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 11:35 am
  Think again.Three people rob a person of his wallet and necklace at gunpoint. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 3:00 am by Michael Erdle
In the process, the parties lost all of speed and cost benefits of arbitration. [read post]
23 May 2013, 5:58 am by Timothy P. Flynn
  In a unanimous per curiam opinion, issued without oral arguments, the Supreme Court held in People v Koon that a medical marijuana patient is legal to drive a vehicle, even with some THC in his blood.Rodney Koon was charged under the "zero tolerance" provision of the Motor Vehicle Code which proscribes driving with any amount of a Schedule 1 drug in the driver's system. [read post]
23 May 2013, 5:51 am by Liisa Speaker
The issue of operating a vehicle while internally possessing marijuana pursuant to the Michigan Medical Marijuana Act (“MMMA”) was tackled this week by the Michigan Supreme Court in its review of People v. [read post]
18 May 2013, 12:56 pm by familoo
People must come to IRH knowing what their case is and ready to record what the issues are at FH. [read post]
15 May 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
In the days when people looked up trigonometric functions in tables, recasting a method so as to reduce the number of times the tables had to be consulted might speed up computation, but nothing technical was happening.[2.12] The [applicant] has not provided any evidence that there really is an increase in speed of computation. [read post]
10 May 2013, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
It might increase the taxes being paid by a noncompliant taxpayer, but to call it a new tax is as foolish as calling enforcement of an existing speed limit the enactment of a new speed limit law when the enforcement targets drivers who have been ignoring the speed limit. [read post]
6 May 2013, 6:31 am by Rachel, Law Clerk
The Two Sides of the Minimum Wage Debate: Friedman v. [read post]