Search for: "People v. Tooks" Results 1381 - 1400 of 11,093
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jun 2017, 4:21 pm by INFORRM
It seems then that the Court is still of the view that it may be perfectly proper for states to restrict speech where it is considered particularly offensive to a group of people. [read post]
31 Jan 2007, 10:40 am
These people should have come forward sooner, and they should now urgently consider coming forward to testify publicly - and with documents. [read post]
9 Aug 2015, 8:02 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Steven Salaita, a tenured professor at Virginia Tech, took a job at University of Illinois. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 4:33 pm by INFORRM
The Court took as its starting point the well-established proposition that a person cannot rely on Article 8 “to complain of damage to his reputation which foreseeably results from his own actions, such as the commission of a criminal offence” [108]. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 2:52 pm by Michel-Adrien
This was perhaps best exemplified by the rendering of the verdict in R v Theriault, 2020 ONSC 5725 [Theriault], in June, in which over 20,000 people watched the verdict being read to hear whether the Theriault brothers, two off-duty police officers who pursued and injured Dafonte Miller, a Black teen, would be convicted of assault. [read post]
6 Nov 2012, 3:10 pm by Samuel Sorich
The Second Appellate District’s Division Three took an opposite view in its October 29, 2012, decision in Hartford Casualty Insurance Co. v. [read post]
11 Dec 2010, 11:09 am by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) Here’s another case showing how American law applies to people with different cultural assumptions from our own, State v. [read post]