Search for: "Plaintiff(s)"
Results 1381 - 1400
of 178,347
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jan 2022, 5:56 am
Plaintiff filed this personal injury suit, asserting that defendant’s negligence caused his injuries. [read post]
19 Dec 2020, 6:05 am
The defendants ordered x-rays several days later, which revealed that the prosthetic had perforated through the plaintiff’s femur and into the muscles of his thigh. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 6:26 am
On cross-examination, many inconsistencies in the plaintiff’s testimony were exposed. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 9:27 am
The trial court rejected the plaintiff’s objection and granted the defendant’s motion, leading the plaintiff to appeal to the Missouri Supreme Court. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 3:03 pm
Finding such circumstances existed in the plaintiff’s case, the court held that the plaintiff should have automatically been granted an extension to file a proper certificate. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 7:58 am
ICBC argued the Plaintiff should be found 25% at fault for placing himself in harm’s way. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 9:19 am
The lawsuit said that the plaintiffs developed mesothelioma due to the company’s talcum powder and Shower to Shower used on them as children by their parents. [read post]
18 Mar 2018, 8:14 am
The Court’s Analysis The court agreed with the defendant and affirmed the dismissal of the plaintiff’s lawsuit. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 4:25 pm
It is not called the “plaintiff’s tort” for nothing. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 9:04 am
In this week’s case (Quartey-Harrison v. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 2:38 pm
The defendant in the case was a real estate developer that purchased property located across the street from the plaintiff’s house. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 7:17 am
The plaintiff reportedly learned of earlier reprimands against the director. [read post]
25 Aug 2020, 6:00 am
This opinion concerns the lead derivative plaintiff’s subsequent motion to compel, which sought the production of forty-two documents the SLC withheld on work product grounds. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 5:00 am
The plaintiff commenced this action, alleging that the termination of her employment violated Labor Law § 201-d(2)(c), which bars an employer from discharging an employee because of the employee's legal recreational activities outside work hours. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 5:00 am
The plaintiff commenced this action, alleging that the termination of her employment violated Labor Law § 201-d(2)(c), which bars an employer from discharging an employee because of the employee's legal recreational activities outside work hours. [read post]
27 Jul 2016, 1:22 pm
In its order, the trial court stated: “There was an automobile collision… Plaintiff’’s insured…was walking on the sidewalk. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 11:31 am
It’s now been halved – down to 2 years. [read post]
4 May 2023, 10:50 am
Where an Tennessee HCLA plaintiff’s HIPAA authorization had an error in the “purpose” section, but the potential defendants only included two physicians who were employed by the third potential defendant health system and plaintiff asserted that the defendant health system was the only potential defendant who possessed any relevant medical records, the Court of Appeals vacated dismissal based on the noncompliant HIPAA authorization and held that… [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 10:00 am
The two initiators of the common law are the plaintiff and the attorney. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 12:30 pm
Plaintiff’s knowledge is not similar to what is required of a pilot. [read post]
