Search for: "Public Citizen v. Department of Justice"
Results 1381 - 1400
of 1,965
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Apr 2016, 8:41 am
Department of Justice changed its policy relating to keeping the use of Stingrays a secret. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 12:43 pm
The lawsuit in Al-Aulaqi, et al., v. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 5:26 am
United States v. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 9:32 am
The other branches of government and the general public have to obey Supreme Court decisions. [read post]
5 Dec 2024, 9:00 pm
In Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye v. [read post]
4 Nov 2024, 6:39 am
The Department of Justice appealed that ruling to the U.S. [read post]
23 May 2015, 9:00 pm
., Petitioner, v. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am
He claims that the county accused him of mismanaging public funds as a pretext to fire him for being gay. [read post]
8 Oct 2011, 12:57 pm
Crawford v. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 1:26 am
On 9 September the BBC had a piece about the US Department of Justice taking legal action to defend President Donald Trump in a defamation case from a woman who accuses him of raping her. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 11:00 am
But it is politically unlikely that Congress would depart dramatically from its own federal bribery statute, and presently, the public lacks the information to seriously debate whether President Trump’s conduct has triggered it. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 2:56 pm
Alternatively, the defences of truth and public interest were made out [175-6]. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 1:55 pm
INS, 667 F.2d 771 (1981); Lauvik v. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 6:01 am
This provoked a reported response from the Chief Justice in the following terms: My statement as to delays was not exaggerated, as the following figures will prove. [read post]
26 Mar 2023, 4:17 am
We have previously written about attempts of police departments to criminally charge citizens for filming them in public, an effort that I have long criticized. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 6:30 am
But, of course, limiting the court’s jurisdiction to U.S. citizens leads to the inevitable question from other nations: why do our citizens deserve less from your government? [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 9:14 pm
Either way, whether it is retroactive or not, the term limits statute the Biden Commission on Supreme Court Reform proposal favored, which never made its way into the public eye, is unconstitutional. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm
As Justice Scalia explained in what proved to be a prescient dissent in the 1988 case of Morrison v. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 11:27 am
The first type—an assertion of presidential communications privilege—represents the core of executive privilege that was first recognized in U.S. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 11:10 am
Edwards v. [read post]
