Search for: "Qui Tam"
Results 1381 - 1400
of 4,759
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
Medical Director Receives $950K after Blowing Whistle on Alleged False Claims to California Medicaid
31 Aug 2023, 12:59 pm
Qui tam whistleblowers are eligible to receive between 15 and 30% of the government’s recovery. [read post]
20 Sep 2024, 10:43 am
” The settlement resolves allegations made in three separate qui tam whistleblower lawsuits. [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 12:45 pm
Since 1986, qui tam suits have allowed the government to recover over $70 billion from fraudsters. [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 9:30 am
” Such a change could prove highly beneficial to defendants facing qui tam actions, particularly those with very little detail. [read post]
24 Aug 2018, 11:28 am
District Court for the Northern District of California’s order denying the defendant’s motion for summary judgment in a qui tam action brought under the False Claims Act. [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 7:26 pm
Supreme Court will hear may set new limits on qui tam lawsuits against drug makers, biotechnology companies and other businesses. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 7:48 am
Defendant's motion to dismiss plaintiff's qui tam false marking action for failure to state a claim was granted. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 4:58 am
Justin Gray, Gray on Claims: If the comprehensive patent reform amendment announced today is passed, qui tam plaintiffs who have been hunting for expired patent numbers to bring false marking suits will be out of luck. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 1:21 pm
While the $2.2 billion recovered by the Department and qui tam relators was down from the prior year, 2022 saw a record number of new FCA matters initiated. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 7:52 pm
The Update summarizes the Department of Justice statistics on False Claims Act matters and qui tams, which I reference in the the blog, for 2011, and includes several illustrative charts based on those statistics.The Update provides a good review of "noteworthy settlements" in the "second half" of 2011 (Gibson Dunn had reviewed the first part of 2011 in their mid-year update). [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 12:19 pm
Supreme Court ruled in the qui tam case, U.S. ex rel. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 8:39 am
We discuss the Forest Group case itself, the history of qui tam actions going back to the middle ages, pending appeals and district court cases, and open questions in light of the Forest Group decision. [read post]
8 May 2014, 9:47 am
On May 8, the Department of Justice announced that the United States was intervening in a qui tam case against an Idaho-based college and its owner, alleging illegal incentive payments to student recruiters. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 7:27 am
More information for potential healthcare fraud whistleblowers is located at the Nolan Auerbach & White main website.The post Department of Justice Increases Civil Penalties for False Claim Act Violations first appeared on Qui Tam 101. [read post]
24 Aug 2018, 11:28 am
District Court for the Northern District of California’s order denying the defendant’s motion for summary judgment in a qui tam action brought under the False Claims Act. [read post]
19 Aug 2007, 10:50 pm
The lawsuit was originally filed by Normal Rille and Neal Roberts under qui tam provisions of the False Claims Act. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 1:42 pm
In any event, compliance programs in health care organizations is crucial in today’s overregulated environment, with qui tam attorneys, whistleblowers, regulators, and payors seeking any potential excuse to recoup. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 6:35 am
Defendant's motion to transfer venue of plaintiff's qui tam false marking action was granted. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 10:37 pm
Hawaii Pacific Health, the NInth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the District Court’s dismissal of a qui tam suit brought by two doctors, who alleged that the hospitals and related practices submitted false claims and cost reports to Hawaii’s Medicaid program. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 7:08 am
Defendant's motion for Rule 11 sanctions for plaintiffs' filing of a qui tam false marking action was denied despite defendant's arguments that plaintiffs' counsel knew the mismarking was a scrivener's error that could not be corrected due to a lack funds. [read post]
