Search for: "ROBERT BUSH" Results 1381 - 1400 of 3,551
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Nov 2014, 5:23 am by Amy Howe
At Truthdig, Bill Blum discusses the role of Chief Justice John Roberts on the Bush legal team in Bush v. [read post]
18 Sep 2010, 10:33 am by Big Tent Democrat
And then there's the fact that TAP's Editor-in-Chief, Robert Kuttner, wrote an article in February of this year -- in that very magazine -- entitled . . . . wait for it . . . . [read post]
18 May 2011, 12:02 pm by Ashby Jones
Bush’s nominations of Samuel Alito and John Roberts to the Supreme Court: This confirmation battle should be framed by the fact that Liu raced to launch a shoddy attack against the nomination of John Roberts to the Supreme Court and, testifying at Samuel Alito’s confirmation hearing, demagogically smeared Alito. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 8:28 pm by Richard Frank
Bush’s Administration (and Bush’s unsuccessful nominee to the D.C. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 7:24 am by Matt Sundquist
Also reporting on this past year is Chief Justice John Roberts, who issued a report on the Federal Judiciary. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 1:11 pm
With Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Alito now firmly ensconsed, we might be on the verge of a significant paradigm-shift within the Court. [read post]
13 Nov 2007, 8:43 am
It's ironic then that Dworkin can so harshly condemn the Roberts' Court. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 6:18 pm
 Nixon appointed 4 Justices (Burger, Powell, Blackmun, Rehnquist), Ford 1 (Stevens), Carter 0, Reagan 3 (O'Connor, Scalia, Kennedy), Bush I 2 (Souter, Thomas), Clinton 2 (Ginsburg, Breyer), Bush II 2 (Roberts, Alito), and Obama so far 2 (Sotomayor, Yournamehere). [read post]
21 Dec 2018, 12:56 pm by Amy Howe
” Trump’s comments elicited a rare public rebuke from Chief Justice John Roberts, who shot back that the federal judiciary does not “have Obama judges or Trump judges, Bush judges or Clinton judges. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 9:00 pm
Washington  saw repeated erosion of Fourth Amendment rights that had been better protected under the Warren Court, before Richard Nixon nominated Warren Burger as chief justice and added Justice William Rehnquist to the court, followed by Reagan's  adding  Justice Scalia, Bush I's adding Justice Thomas, and Bush II's adding Justice Alito and Chief Justice Roberts. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 9:56 am by Andrew Hamm
Bush nominated John Roberts to replace Justice Sandra Day O’Connor within three weeks of her retirement on July 1, 2005. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 2:02 pm by Mark Walsh
Bush to succeed her when she announced her retirement, Roberts said she seemed a little put out that he did not commit to hiring her law clerks, though Roberts felt he should at least wait until he was confirmed before addressing that issue. [read post]
4 Nov 2017, 4:13 am by Garrett Hinck
Paul Rosenzweig shared video of an interview with Melissa Hathaway, former senior cybersecurity adviser in the Bush administration, on the future of cybersecurity. [read post]
21 May 2024, 4:00 am by Guest Blogger
I’m no legal expert, but I doubt there is a basis for the immunity Trump seeks in any possible reading of the Constitution, except perhaps by the former Bush administration officials who sought to justify torture on the ground that Congress lacks authority restrict the President’s apparently unlimited Commander-in-Chief powers. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 11:47 am
By contrast, the Bush administration had used money from a general congressional appropriation. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 11:47 am
By contrast, the Bush administration had used money from a general congressional appropriation. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 1:53 pm by Ritika Singh
Robert Bales–and the New York Times has his story. [read post]
24 May 2011, 9:40 am by Sean Patrick Donlan
Don't forget our discount (see right-hand side panel): Research Methodologies in EU and International Law Robert Cryer, Tamara Hervey and Bal Sokhi-Bulley, with Alexandra Bohm Law research students often begin their PhDs without having an awareness of methodology, or the opportunity to think about the practice of research and its theoretical implications. [read post]