Search for: "STATE v FRIEDMAN"
Results 1381 - 1400
of 1,508
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Aug 2008, 8:45 am
Sweeney, who presided over the month-long trial that ended on July 17.The Court of Appeal's 2005 decision in State Farm v. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 5:45 pm
Foods that have been sources of contamination include ground beef, venison, sausages, dried (non-cooked) salami, unpasteurized milk and cheese, unpasteurized apple juice and cider (Cody, et al., 1999), orange juice, alfalfa and radish sprouts (Breuer, et al., 2001), lettuce, spinach, and water (Friedman, et al., 1999). [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 2:03 pm
United States. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 3:26 pm
Merrick v. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 8:41 pm
Kasowitz, Benson, Torres & Friedman v. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 12:47 pm
See Friedman at 1427. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 7:48 am
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 1:37 pm
The Court of Appeals decision yesterday (Thursday) in the case of Board of Commissioners of LaPorte County, Board of Commissioners of Porter County, Town of Beverly Shores, et al v. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 7:14 pm
I am also posting the roster from previous Conglomerate Junior Scholars Workshops: David Adam Friedman, Reinventing Consumer Protection Miriam Baer, Insuring Corporate Crime Trey Drury, What's the Cost of a Free Pass? [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 1:56 pm
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 2:32 pm
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
30 May 2008, 12:28 pm
Friedman and Emmet G. [read post]
30 May 2008, 9:09 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: WHO members near accord on global strategy on IP and health: (Intellectual Property Watch), (GenericsWeb), (Gowlings), (IAM), Copiepresse seeks up to €49 million from Google in lawsuit over right to feature links to publishers’ content on internet: (IPKat), (Ars Technica), (Techdirt), (Out-Law), (IP Law360) Singapore ‘image… [read post]
29 May 2008, 7:47 am
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
24 May 2008, 6:35 am
If a construction cannot be constitutional without being consistent with prior principle, then the legitimacy of the New Deal and other important periods of informal (non-Article V) change cannot be explained. [read post]
23 May 2008, 11:39 am
If a construction cannot be constitutional without being consistent with prior principle, then the legitimacy of the New Deal and other important periods of informal (non-Article V) change cannot be explained. [read post]
22 May 2008, 7:55 am
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
22 May 2008, 1:37 am
"
OUTSIDE COUNSEL:
'Shellef': Rules 8(a) and 8(b) and Joinders of CountsThursday, May 22, 2008By Paul Shechtman" Paul Shechtman, a member of Stillman, Friedman & Shechtman, writes that the recent Second Circuit decision in United States v. [read post]
20 May 2008, 6:31 am
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, 6521/05 v. [read post]
17 May 2008, 4:02 pm
Finally, the article will highlight the legal problems posed by § 3509(m) and comment on current case law, including the pending case of United States v. [read post]
